Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Version 15 wasn't long-term-support: I think the support ended in January of this year! You need to get version 17, which will keep you in updates until 2019.
Well, I'm running 'small' hardware. Would like to try to avoid the later and bigger releases. Just want to get the available fixes for this one, and leave it as it is...
Unless you are doing something really resource hungry, such as editing video, the biggest variable in resource usage is generally the desktop environment itself. Generally, what distinguishes so-called light-weight distros is the use of light-weight desktops.
If you want to stick with Mint, you could install the current release, then install and use a light-weight desktop such as LXDE or even a window manager such as Fluxbox. I set up a computer with 1GB RAM like that for my son and the performance was acceptable when he was logged in to LXDE.
You would leave the default desktop in place, just not use it.
Last edited by frankbell; 08-01-2014 at 06:52 PM.
Reason: clarity
What I have is two identical Acer Nettops with 1.8 Mhz Atom processors, 2 gig of ram. This one has the Mint 15 distro, though I've forgotten which environment is on it. The other machine, which my wife uses, has Mint 16, and I made a point on that one to use the LXDE environment, based on an earlier cycle of trying to figure out why these machines were kinda doggy. It's truthfully not faster than this Mint 15 unit, in spite of the lighter environment. Some of the problem was mitigated by moving away from firefox to opera, but these machines are not what most people would be happy with, though they're O.K. for email and casual browsing, if you're not in a hurry...
I'm REALLY trying to avoid upgrading, as I see no value in this for these modest machines. It's a pain in the rear, for what might be a downgrade in performance. Linux, like all software, grows with time. One has to decide where the limits are on an individual basis.
This computer has a 32-bit processor and 1GB of RAM. I use it for reviewing distros, and Mint 17 Mate ran perfectly on it. I can't remember much difference difference between versions 15 and 17.
What I have is two identical Acer Nettops with 1.8 Mhz Atom processors, 2 gig of ram.
That should be plenty for most contemporary Linux distros, though you might want a lighter-weight desktop. I'm running Slackware --current on a computer with similar specs and it works just fine (it's got an Intel CPU, though, not AMD). I do use E17 for my desktop, because I really like E17. It and Fluxbox are my favorite GUI interfaces.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.