Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Microsoft has been working on IE for a decade and they still can't get it right. And has it occured to anyone that the number of vulnerabilities reported is rather worthless in comparison to the number of vulnerabilities exploited? A good portion of Firefox vulnerabilities have been reported and corrected in a single 24 hour period, long before any exploits reached the wild.
I am not trying to say that firefox guarantees better security. But I am pointing out that the methods of this study are significantly flawed and being blown out of proportion by media shops that sell large amounts of advertising to a Redmond, WA firm that will remain anonymous.
I'm also not sure how this thread contributes to LQ.org and Linux as a whole.
one of firefox's advantage in the past was that not many people used it, so very few attackers gave any attention to it (i guess). now that it is popular, it is getting their attention.
anyway, if firefox responds quickly to the problems, it is still going to be better, because now they'll be able to fix what wasn't found to be broken.
I've a tip. Click on his profile link, then "Add futurist to Your Ignore List". Works great, it's fun and you won't waste time reading his useless posts... What saddens me the most is the he is actually from Malaysia, a third world country that boards with many other poor countries where Linux should actually be a good alternative against piracy and he calls himself the "Linux Terminator"... it's just sad... sad that there are still peoples that ignorant.
Last edited by Mega Man X; 09-21-2005 at 12:26 AM.
Don't be angry,
I just want you to know there is bug in firefox,
this is widely reported in CNET.com,
not me who spread it.
I actually like firefox, but right now i use Opera and IE more often.
I just installed Mozilla Suite , it is very nice too.
It is not news that there are bugs in Firefox, or IE, or Opera. It is also not news that Symantec makes a fortune selling antivirus products to Windows users and wishes to continue doing so. If Mozilla were not addressing Firefox bugs promptly and effectively, THAT would be news. You're seeing the open source development model at work here: Firefox is relatively new software with source code that anyone can download and analyse for vulnerabilities, and a lot of people are doing just that. I expect the picture will look very different next year - how many submarine vulnerabilities lie in IE waiting to be discovered?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.