LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2012, 02:39 PM   #16
pan64
LQ Addict
 
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian/ubuntu/suse ...
Posts: 21,842

Rep: Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309Reputation: 7309

the problem is that you (we) have no any idea about the reason, so probably you will have additional 2 blocks on every [rainy] day or even the disk may die "suddenly". 2 blocks, 8 kb space itself is not a problem at all (of course). Recovering lost data is a problem and costs much more than a new disk.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 08-29-2012, 11:09 PM   #17
imayneed
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Distribution: Arch, Kubuntu
Posts: 76

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Got you now!
 
Old 08-31-2012, 02:59 AM   #18
imayneed
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2012
Distribution: Arch, Kubuntu
Posts: 76

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Got you better now!

If I run ntfsresize using a minus bad blocks option, do you think it will help?
How do I run ntfsresize using a minus bad blocks option, so that the drive will be 'safe' or will it be safe?
Do you have any other suggestion than running ntfsresize using minus bad blocks option?
Can I run ntfsresize when a 2TB drive has only 125GB free space; shortly will it affect my data in there?
(I am already checking about ntfsresize, but still want to get user opinion and advices)

P.S.: The more I read about ntfsresize, I realize that --bad-blocks is just a work out. Would Western Digital replace the drive since it has bad clusters and it is still under guarantee (They never replied my e-mail case though)?

Last edited by imayneed; 08-31-2012 at 03:22 AM.
 
Old 08-25-2015, 11:46 AM   #19
stevedonato
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: SouthWest Florida on the Gulf of Mexico
Distribution: Linux Mint 18.3
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Angry This only happens on WD drives 1-3+TB and above

The spliceing I/O error, and not being able to copy files in my expierence only happens on Western Digital Drives. I just returned 2 brand new WD Black 3TB (5yr warranty) drives with the same problem, Replaced with 3TB Hitachi drives used (2 years old) they work perfect. I have Hitachi drives over 10 yrs. old with zero errors.



Quote:
Originally Posted by imayneed View Post
This is the chkdsk /r result from Windows and it shows only 2 bad clusters.

Code:
2 bad clusters.
8kb in bad sectors.
488369919 total allocation units on disk.
488333004 allocation units available on disk.
Because of that 8kb space, the disk is unsafe (I am asking because I don't have much knowledge about disks and bad clusters). It is just surprising me that 2 bad clusters would show a sign of being unsafe. Of course, I don't know anything about bad clusters or how many there can or should be.
 
Old 02-28-2016, 10:44 AM   #20
stevedonato
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2015
Location: SouthWest Florida on the Gulf of Mexico
Distribution: Linux Mint 18.3
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Angry Super Unreliable WD Black Drives are the worst

WD replaced my 2 WD black 3TB drives with WD RED drives. (my brother had same Black problem).

I lost a ton of data on the WD Black drives that were only a few months old. The drives are Junk and should be removed from the market by WD.

Their (less expensive) RED drives seem to be Solid. Both my brother and I have had NO problems using these replacement 3TB 7200RPM drives.
I don't understand why WD continues to sell more expensive Black 5 yr warranted drives that Don't work?
I recommend all to stay away from WD Black drives, even for free. You will loose your data.

Old Hitachi 3TB 7200RPM are the best. I bought 2 used ones and never had a failure. I have owned Hitachi drives (purchased new) for over 10 years and never one failure. WD owns Hitachi now.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFS Large File Copies Fail - Error writing to file: Input/output error deck- Linux - Server 10 08-01-2022 02:30 AM
Can't copy DVD with dd, Input/output error Klink-a-dink-dink Linux - Software 7 07-20-2022 11:12 AM
dd fails to copy random discs: Input/output error scorchgeek Linux - Hardware 5 09-18-2011 04:59 PM
Copy from DVD - Input/Output error nifflerX Linux - General 2 10-12-2005 02:32 PM
Can't rm file with Input/Output error drlaz Linux - General 0 02-23-2005 06:06 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration