Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I am looking at purchasing a laptop (HP EliteBook Mobile Workstation), but I am not sure whether to buy one with ATI or NVIDIA graphics. My only real concern for graphics is driver support. Which has better support?
BTW, I dont know if this is important, but I will be installing Fedora linux (12 or higher, haven't decided, and will take suggestions on that too!)
Nvidia's proprietary driver is better than ATI's proprietary driver. If you want hardware acceleration and best performance, probably go Nvidia.
However, ATI is more supportive than Nvidia of the open source driver, which is improving rapidly. Some cards have decent hardware acceleration. If you prefer to run free software over proprietary and either don't need hardware acceleration or are getting a card that supports hardware acceleration with the open source driver, go ATI.
Thank you adamk75 and reed9 -- that information is very helpful! I was worried about Optimus technology support. I've also noticed in the HP clusters I use at work, that the ATI graphics chip (ATI ES 1000)does not have an optimal driver. Thanks again to both of you!
Actually, the radeon driver fully supports the ES1000. Perhaps you're noticing that the ES1000 is a graphics chipset for servers, and has absolutely no 3D capabilities whatsoever, and barely any 2D acceleration either.