Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I have this message twice every boottime (don't remember exactly):
"There are differences between boot sector and its backup
Not automatically fixing this
Differences (offset: original/backup) :
...."
I have 2 hard drives
I use Debian, kernel : 2.6.1
Other question : Does a line in etc/fstab that have the option "noauto" can print an error "wrong fs type" during boot time?
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,629
Rep:
1st Q: I'd suggest you re-install your GRUB / LILO since this overwrites the boot-sector and thus should produce any necessary backup (Reason: since you obviously can boot now, there is some risk that the backup is corrupted and thus you should ensure correct backup...)
2nd Q: You can get this error for sure, but it has got nothing to do with "noauto" (only with the file system type you try to mount). Make sure of the file system type on the device you try to mount to your mount point, e.g. with "fdisk".
Code:
man mount
man fstab
man fdisk
alternatively use the help menu of fdisk (just start it...)
1) Well i have run "lilo" (to reinstall lilo), nothing changed. I noticed that the so-called "backup" of boot sector was in a file called "boot.NNNN" in /boot/. Yes there is a file /boot/boot.0300 . I saw that "lilo -s file" could make this backup. So i did "lilo -s /boot/boot.0300" (after having renamed the old boot.0300). But nothing changed neither. Maybe the number NNNN is false...
2) I think the problem comes from my 3 FAT partitions because i have 3 "Wrong fs type ..." errors during boot.
Distribution: openSuSE Tumbleweed-KDE, Mint 21, MX-21, Manjaro
Posts: 4,629
Rep:
Quote:
Originally posted by GruiX
...
1) Well i have run "lilo" (to reinstall lilo), nothing changed. I noticed that the so-called "backup" of boot sector was in a file called "boot.NNNN" in /boot/. Yes there is a file /boot/boot.0300 . I saw that "lilo -s file" could make this backup. So i did "lilo -s /boot/boot.0300" (after having renamed the old boot.0300). But nothing changed neither. Maybe the number NNNN is false...
Dunno what lilo is doing here, I usually do my backup of the bootsector with dd and else use GRUB, sorry no more ideas here...
Quote:
Originally posted by GruiX
...
2) I think the problem comes from my 3 FAT partitions because i have 3 "Wrong fs type ..." errors during boot.
...
I tried "fat" instead of "vfat", it shown me "mount: fs type fat not supported by kernel"
Use fdisk to check the true type of file system of your partitions and edit fstab accordingly. "fat" is not used as keyword by mount.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.