LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-21-2010, 08:33 AM   #1
ab52
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Windows Backup from Server


So i have an issue, i have lots of Windows Machines running windows XP and windows 7, and i want a way to back them up to our Fedora 8/12 server. i will the server to control the backup now the windows machines

any ideas and sugggestions
 
Old 07-21-2010, 10:12 AM   #2
HasC
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2009
Location: South America - Paraguay
Distribution: Debian 5 - Slackware 13.1 - Arch - Some others linuxes/*BSDs through KVM and Xen
Posts: 329

Rep: Reputation: 55
samba & fullsync, maybe
or amanda / bacula

just some ideas. now, start reading about them, to find what suits you
 
Old 07-24-2010, 09:39 AM   #3
choogendyk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
Links:

http://amanda.zmanda.com/ - Top page with overview and links to downloads, etc.
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Main_Page - The wiki, community documentation.
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Zmanda_Windows_Client - Native Windows Client.
http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Quick_start - Instructions for Quick Install.
http://www.zmanda.com/download-amanda.php - Download page. Windows at bottom.

If you're doing research on Amanda or choosing to use Amanda.

Why: http://blogs.umass.edu/choogend/2007...-about-amanda/
 
Old 07-25-2010, 09:29 AM   #4
jamrock
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Posts: 444

Rep: Reputation: 41
I use Bacula to backup my Windows machines to a Linux server. You can find Bacula at www.bacula.org.

I tried Amanda. My only concern was that, at the time, Amanda did not append to tapes. It required a new tape for each backup session. I don't know if that is still the case.

The down side of Bacula is that the configuration is a bit involved. It takes a while to understand the options. On the other hand, it is a stable, reliable product. I have been able to restore my files when I need to.
 
Old 07-25-2010, 11:37 AM   #5
choogendyk
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: Solaris 9 & 10, Mac OS X, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 1,197

Rep: Reputation: 105Reputation: 105
I believe that is still technically true (Amanda appending to tapes); and, in principle, I agree with the reasons it was done that way. I believe in redundancy, and putting all your eggs on one tape reduces redundancy.

However, with modern tapes having higher capacity and costing more and . . .

One of the departments I manage backups for has a very very tight budget. Took me a couple of years to get a tape library, even though they agreed it was desperately needed, and we were running off the end of dds/3 tapes all that time. Anyway, they couldn't buy enough tapes to fill the library, or to keep a tape for each weekday going back any number of weeks. So, I configured Amanda to do incrementals only and keep them on the holding disk during the week. Then on weekends I do a force full and flush everything out to tape. With that configuration, I only use one tape a week (AIT5), and I can have a couple of months of backups online with the library. That's all automated, by the way. Once set up, it just runs. I never have to worry about it, other than to do periodic tests to make sure it is working. I get daily emails with the results and status.

With my other departments, I didn't see the need of wasting tapes on weekends. So, I did exactly the reverse. I run incrementals only on weekends, and keep them on the holding disk. Then I let Amanda flush everything to tape on Monday and manage the backup levels through the week, so that full backups are distributed through the week and level out the load on the backup system.

With the newer Amanda and its API's, there is even more flexibility; and, I believe, they are developing an option to append to tapes. I wouldn't count on that until it's out, and it's not something I want to use; but, there are enough people who do want it that it has been discussed repeatedly.
 
Old 08-04-2010, 04:38 AM   #6
ab52
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
thanks

Thanks guys

i will look at the above metioned software, i also found something called RESTORE, which runs a backup server, it looks good

thanks
ab
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
backup Windows Server to Red Hat Linux fortunepc Linux - Server 3 05-14-2007 10:35 AM
Remote, automated backup: Windows --> Linux server hamish Linux - Software 1 12-07-2004 10:46 AM
Mounting windows server onto SuSE backup server murungu Linux - General 1 09-20-2004 03:01 PM
Windows backup on to samba server ieuuk Linux - Networking 5 08-23-2004 03:00 PM
Using Linux Redhat 9 to Backup Windows Server Files linuxbuck Linux - Software 1 03-07-2004 08:48 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration