LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server
User Name
Password
Linux - Server This forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2016, 10:32 AM   #1
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question unknown partition table dell 720 centOS 7 after kernel upgrade


Dear all,
I am managing a dell r720 server, which is configured with 2 RAID partitions (see below) via the dell H710 raid manager.
after the latest kernel update of centos 7, my server floods the error log with the following error :
"/dev/sdb unknown partition table"

the report of the following command:

[CODE]
omreport storage vdisk
[CODE]

gives

Code:
List of Virtual Disks in the System

Controller PERC H710P Mini (Embedded)
ID                                : 0
Status                            : Ok
Name                              : VD-1
State                             : Ready
Hot Spare Policy violated         : Not Assigned
Encrypted                         : No
Layout                            : RAID-1
Size                              : 837.75 GB (899527213056 bytes)
T10 Protection Information Status : No
Associated Fluid Cache State      : Not Applicable
Device Name                       : /dev/sda
Bus Protocol                      : SAS
Media                             : HDD
Read Policy                       : Adaptive Read Ahead
Write Policy                      : Write Back
Cache Policy                      : Not Applicable
Stripe Element Size               : 64 KB
Disk Cache Policy                 : Disabled

ID                                : 1
Status                            : Ok
Name                              : VD-2
State                             : Ready
Hot Spare Policy violated         : Not Assigned
Encrypted                         : No
Layout                            : RAID-5
Size                              : 18,627.50 GB (20001125826560 bytes)
T10 Protection Information Status : No
Associated Fluid Cache State      : Not Applicable
Device Name                       : /dev/sdb
Bus Protocol                      : SAS
Media                             : HDD
Read Policy                       : Adaptive Read Ahead
Write Policy                      : Write Back
Cache Policy                      : Not Applicable
Stripe Element Size               : 64 KB
Disk Cache Policy                 : Disabled
the output of the lsscsi command gives:
Code:
[0:2:0:0]    disk    DELL     PERC H710P       3.13  /dev/sda
[0:2:1:0]    disk    DELL     PERC H710P       3.13  /dev/sdb
dmesg gives:
Code:
[    2.625903] scsi 0:2:0:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC H710P       3.13 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    2.626089] scsi 0:2:1:0: Direct-Access     DELL     PERC H710P       3.13 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    2.626892] mpt2sas0: MSI-X vectors supported: 1, no of cores: 8, max_msix_vectors: 8
[    2.626943] mpt2sas 0000:03:00.0: irq 69 for MSI/MSI-X
[    2.626975] mpt2sas0-msix0: PCI-MSI-X enabled: IRQ 69
[    2.626978] mpt2sas0: iomem(0x00000000d9ff0000), mapped(0xffffc90016980000), size(65536)
[    2.626979] mpt2sas0: ioport(0x000000000000dc00), size(256)
[    2.632453] fbcon: mgadrmfb (fb0) is primary device
[    2.645253] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] 1756889088 512-byte logical blocks: (899 GB/837 GiB)
[    2.645273] sd 0:2:1:0: [sdb] 39064698880 512-byte logical blocks: (20.0 TB/18.1 TiB)
[    2.645343] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
[    2.645346] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
[    2.645361] sd 0:2:1:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[    2.645364] sd 0:2:1:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 1f 00 00 08
[    2.645404] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[    2.645426] sd 0:2:1:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[    2.646054]  sda: sda1 sda2
[    2.646214]  sdb: unknown partition table
[    2.646429] sd 0:2:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
[    2.646499] sd 0:2:1:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
it seems like now the 2 raid systems are read as sda1 (containing /dev/sda) and sda2 (containing /dev/sdb) and sdb is ignored.

Last edited by MightyU; 02-08-2016 at 09:08 AM.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 09:30 AM   #2
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
Then try to use testdisk.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 09:35 AM   #3
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
More details:

Code:
partx -l /dev/sda
# 1:      2048-  2054143 (  2052096 sectors,   1050 MB)
# 2:   2054144-1755152383 (1753098240 sectors, 897586 MB)
partx -l /dev/sdb
partx: /dev/sdb: failed to read partition table

Code:
Filesystem                1K-blocks       Used   Available Use Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos-root    81880000    6619196    75260804   9 /
devtmpfs                   32863676          0    32863676   0 /dev
tmpfs                      32879540          0    32879540   0% /dev/shm
tmpfs                      32879540      17660    32861880   1% /run
tmpfs                      32879540          0    32879540   0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda1                    993528     291420      634424  32% /boot
/dev/dm-6               19454492920 7017457584 11460401584  38% /scrap
/dev/dm-7                  24056928     118052    22693796   1% /home
/dev/dm-9                 695977956   33686768   662291188   5% /var
/dev/dm-8                  24557860      33020    24524840   1% /tmp
/scrap should be assigned to sdb but it is not: it is assigned to /dev/dm-6 .

Code:
uname -a : Linux chef 3.10.0-327.4.5.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jan 25 22:07:14 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I guess that there is a conflict between modules in the kernel?


Code:
Disk /dev/sdb - 20 TB / 18 TiB - CHS 2431665 255 63
Current partition structure:
     Partition                  Start        End    Size in sectors

   P Linux LUKS               0   0  1 2431665  10 25 39064698880

Last edited by MightyU; 02-08-2016 at 09:42 AM. Reason: added reply to keruskerfuerst
 
Old 02-08-2016, 09:45 AM   #4
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keruskerfuerst View Post
Then try to use testdisk.
I will run the analysis now, it is going to take a while.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 12:03 PM   #5
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
/scrap should be assigned to sdb but it is not: it is assigned to /dev/dm-6 .

But this cant be true.
 
Old 02-09-2016, 02:27 AM   #6
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Yes, I agree. The system was OK until last kernel update, I just do not how understand what happened after I switched to 3.10.0-327.4.5.el7. The disk analysis is still at 68%, when this ends I will load an older kernel and see if the problem persists. And file a report to centOS in case.
 
Old 02-10-2016, 08:45 AM   #7
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
disk analysis does not reveal errors in the disks

Further details:

Code:
# lsblk -a
sda                                                 8:0    0 837.8G  0 disk  
├─sda1                                              8:1    0  1002M  0 part  /boot
└─sda2                                              8:2    0   836G  0 part  
  └─luks-CODE1111                                 253:0    0   836G  0 crypt 
    ├─centos-swap                                 253:1    0  46.9G  0 lvm   [SWAP]
    ├─centos-root                                 253:2    0  78.1G  0 lvm   /
    ├─centos-01                                   253:3    0 664.1G  0 lvm   
    │ └─luks-CODE2222                             253:8    0 664.1G  0 crypt /var
    ├─centos-00                                   253:4    0  23.4G  0 lvm   
    │ └─luks-CODE3333                             253:7    0  23.4G  0 crypt /tmp
    └─centos-home                                 253:5    0  23.4G  0 lvm   
      └─luks-CODE4444                             253:9    0  23.4G  0 crypt /home
sdb                                                 8:16   0  18.2T  0 disk  
└─CODE5555                                        253:6    0  18.2T  0 crypt
I see that in "/sys/block/dm-6/"
the name is defined as CODE5555(see sdb above)
a folder for sdb is given in /sys/block/dm-6/slaves

So I do not understand what happened. A remapping of /dev/sdb in dm-6 ? I am not an expert in storage, any help would be appreciated!
 
Old 02-10-2016, 09:00 AM   #8
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
Where did you get the Image of Centos?
 
Old 02-10-2016, 09:14 AM   #9
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
If you mean the image of centos I used to set up the server, I just downloaded the everything iso.
 
Old 02-10-2016, 03:06 PM   #10
Keruskerfuerst
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Horgau, Germany
Distribution: Manjaro KDE, Win 10
Posts: 2,199

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
You have to buy the distro.
 
Old 02-11-2016, 04:50 AM   #11
MightyU
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 26

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
centos?

?
From https://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage
Quote:
What is CentOS Linux?
CentOS Linux is a community-supported distribution derived from sources freely provided to the public by Red Hat for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). As such, CentOS Linux aims to be functionally compatible with RHEL. The CentOS Project mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork. CentOS Linux is no-cost and free to redistribute. Each CentOS version is maintained for up to 10 years (by means of security updates -- the duration of the support interval by Red Hat has varied over time with respect to Sources released). A new CentOS version is released approximately every 2 years and each CentOS version is periodically updated (roughly every 6 months) to support newer hardware. This results in a secure, low-maintenance, reliable, predictable and reproducible Linux environment.
 
  


Reply

Tags
centos, kernel 3, raidctl, storage



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"No partition table or unknown signature on partition table" 10.1 install madcow007 Slackware 4 02-09-2009 11:04 AM
unknown partition table mtb Linux - Hardware 18 03-11-2007 05:45 PM
Slack 10: S-ATA = "No partition table or unknown signature on partition table"? dissolved soul Slackware - Installation 11 08-05-2004 02:12 PM
unknown partition table while testing kernel 2.6.0 drenal Linux - Newbie 2 12-22-2003 05:04 PM
Unknown partition table MrPancake Linux - General 17 01-10-2003 03:03 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Server

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration