Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm having trouble stating named, but systemd is pretty much useless as far as output goes. I'm trying to figure out where I'm suppose to look to see why things are failing.
I added the following to the named.conf.options file:
No go, it's not generating a log. It won't start, and I don't know why because there is no output going anywhere. Any way to figure out why it's failing to start? Could be something wrong with config, but there's no way to know. named-checkconf also outputs nothing.
Last edited by Red Squirrel; 11-26-2021 at 02:09 PM.
When you edit a post to say you've solved it, it continues to occupy space in the Zero Reply Threads list and remains on forced-unread status in New/Latest Posts lists.
If you use a follow up post instead, it doesn't do these things, and it also causes anyone who might have subscribed to the thread to get notified.
Distribution: Mint 20.1 on workstation, Debian 11 on servers
Posts: 1,338
Original Poster
Rep:
Yeah was looking at Devuan, and Slackware. I may play with those. Slackware is fairly mainstream, in that it's a "main" distro and not a fork, while Devuan is a fork, so it's something to consider. Not that there's anything wrong with a fork, but I imagine it does mean there is a bit of a delay for updates. Though I don't think Slackware is considered bleeding edge either by nature. Either way going to have to start experimenting I guess. I'm still on CentOS 6.6 on my servers so need to decide on an upgrade path. The Debian 11 server I was working on got hacked while I was setting it up, no idea how they got in as I had nothing really running on it yet, just apache going to a temporary landing page, OpenSSH and named. They used a similar attack as they used on my previous box which was also CentOS 6.6. Some kind of injection into apache that allows root escalation.
So yeah at this point I gave up hosting my own server after like 15 years of self hosting. Moved the important stuff to a shared host and shut down the other sites/services.
Whatever distro I go to I want to build it into an ultra secure hosting environment that also automates lot of the tedious stuff. (basically like cpanel) Was reading that systemd adds more attack layers too, just due to it's huge complexity. Essentially I want to roll my own distro based on a main one. A custom installer, essentially. Need to read up more on that and experiment.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.