How to force disk caching even if software uses O_DIRECT?
Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
How to force disk caching even if software uses O_DIRECT?
Hi.
Some programs disable OS caching by using O_SYNC or O_DIRECT flags, because they think they can do better caching than OS. Sometimes they're wrong and become very slow.
Is it possible to create a stack of virtual block devices that silently ignores O_DIRECT at some level? Or maybe some filesystems can be tuned to ignore it? I don't care about crashes or power failures, it's not a production environment.
Before opting for a stack of virtual block here is something that may improve the needed performance.
just read that article. I can't change i/o scheduler, because the only available value is "none" (and it's correct, because it's a virtual machine with virtio storage)
I found a thread on LKML where everyone agrees that tmpfs should support O_DIRECT but no change gets made. It points out that the workaround is a loop device.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.