Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I would think this would be vendor specific. The two main fibre cards in intel class systems come from Qlogic and Emulex. For Qlogic you can install scli and get information about their cards that way. (You can get this from Qlogic's web site.) I assume Emulex has something similar but haven't used those.
systool is available in RHEL but not necessarily installed. Also on checking one of my RHEL5 boxes with Qlogic HBAs I don't have either class mentioned in the link. One would have to determine classes by doing ls -l /sys/class. That shows qla2xxxx but one would also need to be aware that there are entries under scsi related to the disks for the fibre presented array. On my RHEL6 box using Qlogic the two classes in the link exist but sysfsutils that has the systool command wasn't installed.
I'm not sure how multipath answers the OP's question. It is used as implied by its name to bind multiple paths to the same disk into a single multipath device which should be used for LVM or partitioning rather than the /dev/sd devices to insure that if one path goes down things continue to work. Is there some sort of performance metrics it provides of which I'm unaware? Also if the user does NOT have multiple paths to devices then it seems this wouldn't be of use. I guess you COULD put a single path into a multipath config but why bother? (Having said that I DO of course, recommend having multiple paths and using multipath for disk presentation.)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.