Linux - ServerThis forum is for the discussion of Linux Software used in a server related context.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My dell switch Cacti graphs are not going/exceeding above 100 MB. Above 100 MB bandwidth utilization is not showing in graph. I am using SNMP version 2 and 64 bit counters and dell switch is supporting 64-Bit counters.
You haven't told us how you configured cacti. Are the bandwidth graphs supposed to be instantaneous or cumulative? The maximum bandwidth of a gigabit link is 125 MB/seconds and depending on frame size, buffers, etc. you might be hard pressed to get much above 100 MB/sec.
I have imported Dell Switch 64 bit counter template on Cacti and created graph with In/Out Bits (64-Bit Counters).
I have observed that some switch ports graphs are going above 100 MB but some are not and sometime reading is not showing proper.
Please read the LQ Rules and the "How to ask a smart question" link in my posting signature. Bumping your own thread is fairly rude...this is a VOLUNTEER forum, so doing this isn't too polite. We answer when we can, if we can. If you're not going to update the thread with new information, there isn't much point in doing this.
btmiller asked you questions, which you haven't yet answered. Until we have details, there isn't much we can tell you.
In some cases graphs are suddenly going high and in some cases it is continuously going above 100 MB.
Please find the attached file. Please let me know if you want more information from my side.
In some cases graphs are suddenly going high and in some cases it is continuously going above 100 MB.
Please find the attached file. Please let me know if you want more information from my side.
Thanks,
Imran Khan.
Yes, you can still answer the questions you were asked before in post #3. Until you do, we can't guess.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.