LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-24-2006, 11:34 AM   #1
MBA Whore
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Distribution: Various: pclos, Debian, Ubuntu, etc . . .
Posts: 649

Rep: Reputation: 30
"Trusted" Computing and Linux


Hi everyone,

I have been following the whole "trusted" computing issue for sometime now (dead set against it), but I want to know, how would this impact Linux?

Specifically, I know some companies (such as IBM) have already introduced some hardware based "trusted" computing on some of their products.

Is there a way around this, or are we just s.o.l.?

AMD and Intel said they are going to support it, though I hope they will not have their entire product line supporting it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_computing"
 
Old 10-26-2010, 06:47 AM   #2
archtoad6
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 234Reputation: 234Reputation: 234
Thought provoking. 4+ years later, any new thoughts?
 
Old 10-26-2010, 12:00 PM   #3
Noway2
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 2,125

Rep: Reputation: 781Reputation: 781Reputation: 781Reputation: 781Reputation: 781Reputation: 781Reputation: 781
I had never heard of this concept before and I read some of the wikipedia article on it. Scary stuff indeed. Undoubtedly such technology would be used for its restrictive purposes rather than the more positive ones. History is full of examples where technology has evolved before the wisdom required to use it wisely and this seems to be no exception. If anything, I think the last four years have brought us closer to this form of reality a-la things like the iPhone and content wars with the media companies refusing to "publish" content (google tv).

Another aspect to this, raised by the article, is the idea of who owns the keys. PKI appears to have been deliberately designed without a "back door" decoder. On one hand, this prevents the designers and implementers from ever being put in a position of "give us the key or else" from government, law enforcement, or anyone else (3rd party validation being an exception). On the flip side, commercial entities could use this to lock down on the data stored in a machine with an extremely high level of effectiveness.

Ultimately, I think that consumer market forces will play a major role in whether or not this type of technology is able to succeed and the form it will take. As long as there are strong community based systems, like Linux, the consumer will at least have a choice. The problem is that so many people are accepting of and willing to pay for licensed and restricted software and systems, be it for convenience or ignorance of a better way.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Somebody in India thinks they'll "Wrest Leadership in Open-Source Computing" LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-11-2006 11:16 AM
Trusted Computing, Linux and the Internet pentalive General 7 07-17-2005 11:53 AM
trusted computing tincat2 General 13 12-06-2003 05:15 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration