Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
If you can visit the facility, do so. Then you can see for yourself.
Some places in America have armed guards posted.
I can't see why anywhere would allow non-staff into the server rooms. They all have at least rudimentary security.
Are you after colocated or hosted servers ? Colocation means it's your machine, and you have to get it to them and probably maintain it. Hosted means it's their machine but they rent it to you.
I've had both, and to be honest, rented is better. You can rent a newer model at any stage and upgrade, rather than having to get rid of a boat anchor and buy a new machine.
If renting a hosted server, and depending on your needs, I would always go for a dedicated server. This means you have control over the whole physical machine. A virtual server means there are many "servers" all on one machine.
Virtualisation is cheaper, and has advanced in security over the years, but you will still be sharing resources (CPU time, RAM, etc).
If you only have one website, with not much traffic, get a virtual server.
If you want to host several sites and use databases and name servers then get a dedicated server.
Normally you would only be able to access even your own colocated systems by arranging an access time and accompanied by a staff member. It is in the colo company's interest to keep the customer's machines secure.
What I was planning to do is to have a LAN of 4 machines plus a separate server containing a WEB site, in colocation in the US, dedicated or rented (if more convenient) as soon as funds permit.
Only the server and one machine in the LAN will be connected to the Internet.
It seems some (or possibly all) companies offer to purchase equipment of your choice for you that you can set up and load with files remotely (from Australia). You can also upgrade to more powerful and bigger machine without affecting access very much (according to their web sites)
Depending on what a visitor wants to do from the WEB site, the other machine connected to the Internet will link with one of the other three computers on the LAN.
I have never done anything like that, you might have hints and tips to help that could save me reinventing the wheel.
Every colocation facility that I've ever been to has different rules for access to server areas. Some use locked racks, while others create chain-link cages for each customer. Some require escorts, but others do not. You can always add BIOS/fireware/bootup passwords, but this can introduce other challenges if you have your servers power-cycled for any reason. Make sure that the facility is close by or they offer remote KVM. Your best best is to read all their policies/documentation and visit the facility to see if it matches up in real life.
My old colo was The planet. You can rent a private network, linking however machines you want, and have one ip for the public network. Don't rush into this. Cheap != better.
But, to be honest, the US is cheaper than anywhere else.
I can't speak for the Planet now as I don't use them any more, but I didn't leave because of the service.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.