Kernel error in centos 6.5 Final

newbie14 · 01-23-2014, 08:51 AM

Dear All,
I ran my logwatch and saw this error present it. Do I need to take any action on this kernel error? The list is much longer then this.

Quote:

WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
ERST: Error Record Serializa ...: 1 Time(s)

1 Time(s): 0: 0x00000001 -> 0x0000009b
1 Time(s): 0: 0x00000100 -> 0x0008bf54
1 Time(s): 0: 0x00100000 -> 0x00270000
1 Time(s): #0 [0000000000 - 0000001000] BIOS data page ==> [0000000000 - 0000001000]
1 Time(s): #1 [0000006000 - 0000008000] TRAMPOLINE ==> [0000006000 - 0000008000]
1 Time(s): #2 [0001000000 - 000201faa4] TEXT DATA BSS ==> [0001000000 - 000201faa4]
1 Time(s): #3 [00370a8000 - 0037fef7e0] RAMDISK ==> [00370a8000 - 0037fef7e0]
1 Time(s): #4 [000009b000 - 0000100000] BIOS reserved ==> [000009b000 - 0000100000]
1 Time(s): #5 [0002020000 - 00020202f8] BRK ==> [0002020000 - 00020202f8]
1 Time(s): #6 [0000008000 - 000000a000] PGTABLE ==> [0000008000 - 000000a000]
1 Time(s): #7 [000000a000 - 000000b000] PGTABLE ==> [000000a000 - 000000b000]
1 Time(s): #8 [0000001000 - 0000001030] ACPI SLIT ==> [0000001000 - 0000001030]
1 Time(s): AMD AuthenticAMD
1 Time(s): Centaur CentaurHauls
1 Time(s): DMA 0x00000001 -> 0x00001000
1 Time(s): DMA32 0x00001000 -> 0x00100000
1 Time(s): Intel GenuineIntel
1 Time(s): NODE_DATA [000000000000b000 - 000000000003efff]
1 Time(s): Normal 0x00100000 -> 0x00270000
1 Time(s): bootmap [000000000003f000 - 000000000008cfff] pages 4e
1 Time(s): (9 early reservations) ==> bootmem [0000000000 - 0270000000]
1 Time(s): - Added public key 4F5B1EA12164261D
1 Time(s): - User ID: CentOS (Kernel Module GPG key)
1 Time(s): ... bit width: 48
1 Time(s): ... event mask: 000000070000000f
1 Time(s): ... fixed-purpose events: 3
1 Time(s): ... generic registers: 4
1 Time(s): ... max period: 000000007fffffff
1 Time(s): ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff
1 Time(s): ... version: 3
1 Time(s): ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
1 Time(s): 00:08: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
1 Time(s): ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it
1 Time(s): ACPI: (supports S0 S5)
1 Time(s): ACPI: AC Adapter [P111] (on-line)
1 Time(s): ACPI: AC Adapter [P112] (off-line)

ukiuki · 01-23-2014, 11:31 AM

This link will clarify your doubts, is it stoping the machine to work properly?

Regards

newbie14 · 01-23-2014, 08:38 PM

Dear Ukiuki,
No my machine is working fine so far but I am worried any problem in near future? Yes I visited the link but its just telling me a logging mechanism but I am not too sure with the contents it say.

ukiuki · 01-23-2014, 10:54 PM

To know if there are hardware problem or not you have to run some tests, could you post the whole log? Lets see what it says first.

Regards

newbie14 · 01-24-2014, 10:06 AM

Dear Ukiuki,
Unfortunately I notice another of my different hardware also showing the same error could it be a bug in Centos 6.5 ? I have attached the error file. I notice this error shows up once you reboot the system.

ukiuki · 01-24-2014, 12:01 PM

Here some info that i find that can be related to your problem:

Quote:

To the best of my knowledge, at this moment in time you cannot boot off of USB 3.0 ports or SATA 3.0 ports. Both require a new hardware layer that is not in Ubuntu just yet.

Once booted, you can read & write to USB 3.0 devices. I don't know about the SATA 3.0 (both my internal hard drives are SATA 3.0, but plugged into SATA 2.0 ports).

That was from Ubuntu forums and the same may happen with Centos, are you doing the same by chance, using sata3 drives on sata2 ports or sata2 drives in sata3 ports and trying to boot?

In the logs we see something with the "link" 3.0Gbps and 1.5Gbps.
As you can see it is says: "failed to resume link".

Code:

 1 Time(s): ata1.00: 1953525168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
 1 Time(s): ata1.00: ATA-8: WD1003FBYX-23        00W1143 00W1447IBM,     WB35, max UDMA/133
 1 Time(s): ata1.00: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
 1 Time(s): ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
 1 Time(s): ata1.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata1.01: failed to resume link (SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x3078 ctl 0x3090 bmdma 0x3050 irq 17
 1 Time(s): ata2.00: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata2.00: failed to resume link (SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata2.01: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata2.01: failed to resume link (SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x3070 ctl 0x308c bmdma 0x3058 irq 17
 1 Time(s): ata3.00: ATAPI: IBM SATA DEVICE 81Y3673, WA82, max UDMA/133
 1 Time(s): ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
 1 Time(s): ata3: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 1 Time(s): ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x3068 ctl 0x3084 bmdma 0x3030 irq 17
 1 Time(s): ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 4 SControl 0)
 1 Time(s): ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x3060 ctl 0x3080 bmdma 0x3038 irq 17
 1 Time(s): ata4: failed to resume link (SControl 0)

It seens more like a bug, but just in case it is a good idea to chech the disk health, run gnome-disk-utility/palimpsest and go through the SMART data, to see what it says about the disk.

Regards

newbie14 · 01-24-2014, 09:12 PM

Dear Ukiuki,
I think is a bug because the other server I have been using for the pass more then 1 year. Ok mine are all minimal installation so no gnome stuff. I tried this yum install palimpsest it says no package found. What is the smart data ? So I am kind of new into this hardware analysis.

newbie14 · 01-25-2014, 08:10 AM

Dear Ukiuki,
I ran the smart command ready.

Quote:

smartctl -i /dev/sda
smartctl 5.43 2012-06-30 r3573 [x86_64-linux-2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-12 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: WD1003FBYX-23 00W1143 00W1447IBM
Serial Number: WD-WCAW36440697
LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 25e4dbdcf
Firmware Version: WB35
User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1.00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated
Local Time is: Sat Jan 25 22:06:51 2014 MYT
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

I ran the health check is this sufficient or should I run with other options?

Quote:

smartctl --health /dev/sda
smartctl 5.43 2012-06-30 r3573 [x86_64-linux-2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-12 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED

newbie14 · 01-25-2014, 09:29 PM

Dear Ukiuki,
Today I totally locked out from the server and had to reboot? Could it be due to all this problem it got hang ?