Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am running Slackware 10, with an ADSL connection. I keep my security patches up to date, and run no unnecessary services. When I do an "netstat -l" as root I get this:
Code:
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
udp 0 0 *:bootpc *:*
I'm still new to this, but I think that means nothing is listening to the outside. So in a case like this, does a firewall make any difference?
I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but I'm going in circles with the documentation.
yeah, you're right, there are no services running, no ports open etc... the bootpc that you see is for addressing etc... I wouldn't worry about a firewall right now, but it can never hurt. Of course it also depends on what purpose this system will serve. If you will have any important and sensitive information on this server, you definately should have a firewall installed. Just block packets with the syn flag set, and that way you can still do business with the outside world, but nobody can connect to you.
Mike.
P.S.
I'm not a firewall expert, but this is similar to my thinking over the years and it's been successful for me.
Last edited by mikeyt_333; 12-05-2004 at 12:05 PM.
I would probably still run a firewall on it for the simple fact that if someone does gain access to the box, they'll have to root it to make use of it as an FTP server or anything like that (assuming you have a default deny policy on outbound traffic as well).
in this situation, i would still run a simple firewall( simple iptables script will do) and logs any incoming packets so that i can know what's the attacker are up to. It is OK if there's no firewall as long as you dont have any open ports or when you dont need NAT or Masq. Cheers!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.