Linux - SecurityThis forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I was planning on buying an SSL certificate soon for a server (first time), but as I shop around there is one point that I am still unclear on: All the CAs advertise that they "sell certificates", and then they list all the certificates you can buy. However, in my books here at home the process is described as:
1. create the private key on your server (with openssl)
2. create a certificate request (public key) from the private key (with openssl)
3. submit the request to the CA
4. the CA signs the certificate and returns it to you
However, the advertisements never mention anything about submitting your key or signing it. So, is that how it actually works? Or do they actually create the private key for you? Or...?
However, the advertisements never mention anything about submitting your key or signing it. So, is that how it actually works? Or do they actually create the private key for you? Or...?
For posterity's sake, I would just add to kbp's post:
If the CA created your private key (or if you transmitted your private key to them) you'd be creating a large hole in the way TLS is supposed to work in securing communication with your service.
Treat it like any other asymmetric encryption scheme. The private key is just as valuable as the data it protects. If you give up the private key, you completely defeat the purpose of the security protocol.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.