LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security
User Name
Password
Linux - Security This forum is for all security related questions.
Questions, tips, system compromises, firewalls, etc. are all included here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-28-2011, 09:19 PM   #1
hydraMax
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Skynet
Distribution: Debian + Emacs
Posts: 467
Blog Entries: 60

Rep: Reputation: 51
Clarification: buying SSL certificates


I was planning on buying an SSL certificate soon for a server (first time), but as I shop around there is one point that I am still unclear on: All the CAs advertise that they "sell certificates", and then they list all the certificates you can buy. However, in my books here at home the process is described as:

1. create the private key on your server (with openssl)
2. create a certificate request (public key) from the private key (with openssl)
3. submit the request to the CA
4. the CA signs the certificate and returns it to you

However, the advertisements never mention anything about submitting your key or signing it. So, is that how it actually works? Or do they actually create the private key for you? Or...?
 
Old 11-28-2011, 09:42 PM   #2
kbp
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,790

Rep: Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653Reputation: 653
Rather than regurgitate information I'll just point you here, let us know if it's still unclear.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 12-03-2011, 11:33 AM   #3
anomie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Distribution: RHEL, Scientific Linux, Debian, Fedora
Posts: 3,935
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydraMax
However, the advertisements never mention anything about submitting your key or signing it. So, is that how it actually works? Or do they actually create the private key for you? Or...?
For posterity's sake, I would just add to kbp's post:

If the CA created your private key (or if you transmitted your private key to them) you'd be creating a large hole in the way TLS is supposed to work in securing communication with your service.

Treat it like any other asymmetric encryption scheme. The private key is just as valuable as the data it protects. If you give up the private key, you completely defeat the purpose of the security protocol.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can SSL Certificates be the same sleepyz Linux - Server 6 02-19-2010 10:52 AM
SSL Certificates ashiers Linux - Security 2 06-30-2006 08:39 AM
SSL certificates the-chains Linux - Software 0 11-15-2004 07:12 PM
ssl certificates champ Linux - Security 2 04-05-2003 09:47 AM
ssl certificates Syncrm Linux - General 7 02-26-2003 10:01 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Security

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration