Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I've just recovered my notebook, and want to install linux as the 2nd OS on it. Now I am not sure, if I should create an extra small boot partition (12-15mb) for boot loader. I know many people do this. But is it really necessary or advantageous to do so?
My situation now is, I used the IBM recovery CD set, so I have only two primary partitions on my disk till now. On the first partition (55GB, NTFS) the winxp is installed, the IBM rescue partition is on the 2nd partition (5GB, FAT32).
So there would be two possibilities to arrange for the multi boot
1st primary: windows xp - 10G, NTFS
2nd primary: suse linux - 10G, reiserfs - linux "/" for system
a) windows d - 15G NTFS
b) windows e - 8G FAT32
c) linux /swap - 1G
d) linux /tmp - 1G
e) linux /home - ca. 10G
4th primary: 5G, FAT32 - IBM rescue partition
1st primary: /boot - 15M
2nd primary: windows xp
3rd extended: with all linux system and /home inside
4th primary: IBM
in the second case, maybe I will need to use partitionmagic to move and generate partitions. only if the /boot partition will bring advantages.