Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
Being completely new to linux, (and loving it), I have a simple question for being a NUBEE. Why would you install a new kernel to a system that is running great with what it has got.
I installed SuSE 9.0 about 1 month ago, it detected all my hardware, loaded all the right modules, made all the updates, and functions flawlessly. Even all the loaded programs (including gnu-cash, which has never worked for me before) perform at 100%.
I guess what I am really after is, are people installing the latest release of the linux kernel just because it is out there or is there significant improvement in performance, speed, etc.
I think at times, I would like to tackle compiling and installing the new kernel, but then I get this crazy thought in my head "WHY FIX IT IF IT AIN'T BROKE"!!!
Please let me know how it goes, as I sometimes think I would also like to experiment. By the way, if you installed 9.0 by default process, I assume you have grub as bootloader. All the posts I have seen refer to lilo.cofig-I do not have lilo.cofig. So I would assume one would have to edit grub.cofig???
every new kernel has either some sort of new support for something or has an improvement or new feature added
the new 2.6 kernel offers all the above; while the updates to the 2.4 kernels (ie going from 2.4.21 to 2.4.22 to 2.4.23) were meant mainly for fixing bugs and adding things that the 2.4 kernel originally meant to achieve, the 2.6 kernel is a whole new version, which means lots of good stuff
to see what i mean, check out http://kniggit.net/wwol26.html
the main improvement i see in my 2.6 kernel is the better design of kernel configuration and compilation (the menu is better and compiling takes half the time than the 2.4 kernels) and the speed increase within the kernel
bootup is faster for me, and the overall feel is faster, even within X (probably the new "preemptive" kernel ability)
*besides, you are not "fixing" anything, you are adding something new; the old kernel will still be on your system (well, if you set it up correctly)
and for the updating of grub, i believe it is /boot/grub/grub.conf that you have to edit
Last edited by TheOneAndOnlySM; 12-25-2003 at 10:47 PM.
As for SuSE 9, I believe they added some stuff into their 2.4 kernel from the 2.6 development, so the upgrade isn't quite as earthshattering as it is for some other distros. ALSA was already in as the default sound...thingy...so that at least is an easier transition to the new kernel.