Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been away from Linux for 18 months and have forgotten a couple of things (my advanced age, no doubt, doesn't help). What is the bash command which lists all volumes physically attached to the system whether mounted or not?
For the purposes of imaging a 4Gb SD card containing a Raspberry Pi operating system to an 8Gb usb stick in such a way as to be able to reload the O/S in its original, bootable format to the card from the stick if needed, would the following command do the job?
I simply mean, what's content of SD card? Does it contain a single file (with .iso as file extension) or lots of files?
The fact that it's a card with a Raspbian system on it that runs on a Pi would indicate that it's NOT a single file .iso image, would it not? This is why I don't really understand your question...
Some authorities say that the source drive should never be mounted for this operation; others say neither source nor target should be. Anyone super-knowledgeable care to settle the question?
Some authorities say that the source drive should never be mounted for this operation; others say neither source nor target should be. Anyone super-knowledgeable care to settle the question?
The target definitely shouldn't be mounted, I don't think it makes a difference if the source is mounted or not.
The source should not be mounted read/write (read-only is OK) or the target will end up with a mildly corrupted filesystem that needs an fsck to clean it up. (Try running "fsck -f -n" on a mounted filesystem if you want to see what to expect. Do not leave off the "-n" or fsck will be very unhappy with you.)
Well in that case it's clear that neither drive should be mounted, then. Next question that arises is: how does the file system get corrupted?? I'm guessing dd isn't the culprit here, so what is?
While a filesystem is mounted read/write, the on-disk metadata is not in a totally clean state. One fairly obvious case is files that have been deleted but are still held open by some process. These will show up in fsck as orphaned inodes (inode is busy, but is not linked from any directory), and fsck will dutifully recover these and put them in lost+found. For any file that is open for writing, the only true copy of the inode state is in memory, not on the disk, and that is true for block allocation maps and group descriptors as well. At a minimum, the "needs_recovery" flag will always be set in the super block.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.