what is the most compatible external hard drive (for back up) for Linux?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
what is the most compatible external hard drive (for back up) for Linux?
Hi. Glad this is here. Question posed is recommendations for best brand that will be the most friendly with Linux.
Also, I cannot find a USB stick that doesn't end up locking files and labelling them all as 'read only'. Any suggestions of remedy and/or brand would be greatly appreciated.
Any cheap Walmart external mini 1tb drives work for me like Toshiba, Sea Gate, whatever is on the shelf.
No need to overthink it at all. Just plug in and use it.
i tend to disagree.
esp. for backup, i would format it to ext4 (or whichever filesystem your distro is using) first.
So don't plug it in and use it. How it is formatted is up to the user so I let that be. That was not the question posed. Mine work as I see fit. I leave it to others to let theirs work as they see fit.
So disagree away I guess. Usually the 1st step in buying a drive that your computer can see and then proceed to see if you can read and write to it. At least in my own private Idaho.
Formatting and testing permissions again comes way later.
So not even sure what you are disagreeing with? KISS?
All I was saying was any wally world (since op is in the USA) would work.
Must be a language thingy I guess.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
I agree that any drive should work -- the times when people have issues it tends to be to do with voltages and/or USB ports which aren't on the motherboard itself and not really a Linux issue. The issues with read-only are likely due to mount-point permissions and are nothing to do with the drive itself but down to Linux/Unix conventions. Buy one, format it to something other than FAT32 if your files will be larger than 4GB and use it -- if you have issues with read-only and the like it's a software problem and somebody will be a,long shortly to tell you how to fix it.
When USB sticks fail, they fail to read-only mode. They have limited writes. Some even have a switch on the side to make them read-only. I can get about six months out of most SDHC cards when used for live linux distros that mostly just watch youtube. Although some fail after only a few hours.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow_7
When USB sticks fail, they fail to read-only mode.
I don't disagree. However, having USB drives turn up as read-only is a pretty common occurrence on Linux as far as I can tell no matter how good the USB drive and what the desktop environment is. The answer, usually, is to work out a a to set the permissions on the mounted drive correctly -- I just chmod things on the mount point but I think the fstab solution is likely the correct one. Either way -- read-only USB storage (I've had it with mp3 players and, I seem to recall, my quadcopter) under Linux is very common as far as I can tell.
well, i've had more than one bad experience with ntfs filesystems on linux.
afaik, these backup programs (rsync...) need a filesystem that handles linux permissions and maybe other things properly - i.e., a linux filesystem... i could be wrong though.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.