Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hi all, profuse apologies for posting this, but I am (as the user name suggests) a complete noob to Linux. I have been given a second hand (previously enjoyed I am told the term is now!) Aspire 1 with Linux on. I am enjoying the Linux experience, apart from the fact that I am unable to get any of my USB sticks working. I get an error message which says
"FAILED TO MOUNT 524M Removable volume. Given device "/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/volume_part_1_size_524288000" is not a volume or drive.
I have been through the instructions on here, and am still unable to get it to mount.
Short of a solution, I am thinking of trying a restore, but given that the use of a USB is called for in a restore, I am a bit nervous about doing so.
Ok, i have also done the following.
[root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 14462 116165983+ 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14463 14593 1052257+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sdb: 524 MB, 524288000 bytes
17 heads, 59 sectors/track, 1020 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1003 * 512 = 513536 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x73696420
This doesn't look like a partition table
Probably you selected the wrong device.
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 ? 1914209 2457017 272218546+ 20 Unknown
Partition 1 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(356, 97, 46) logical=(1914208, 5, 40)
Partition 1 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(357, 116, 40) logical=(2457016, 16, 59)
Partition 1 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb2 ? 1326206 1863570 269488144 6b Unknown
Partition 2 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(288, 110, 57) logical=(1326205, 9, 57)
Partition 2 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(269, 101, 57) logical=(1863569, 13, 16)
Partition 2 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb3 ? 537378 1931558 699181456 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux3
Partition 3 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(345, 32, 19) logical=(537377, 4, 25)
Partition 3 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(324, 77, 19) logical=(1931557, 10, 42)
Partition 3 does not end on cylinder boundary.
/dev/sdb4 * 1390457 1390478 10668+ 49 Unknown
Partition 4 has different physical/logical beginnings (non-Linux?):
phys=(87, 1, 0) logical=(1390456, 5, 1)
Partition 4 has different physical/logical endings:
phys=(335, 78, 2) logical=(1390477, 9, 38)
Partition 4 does not end on cylinder boundary.
Partition table entries are not in disk order
Does this mean that the usb is not formatted in the correct way for linux?
Thanks for the help Tredegar - much appreciated. What may seem a dumb question follows - can one usb stick be used with linux and windows ?
Hi,
yes this is possible but only if you format it as vfat. Do not use a linux specific format because windows can not read it. Also do not use ntfs under winXP because some older linux distros might not be able to handle it.
Thanks for the help Tredegar - much appreciated. What may seem a dumb question follows - can one usb stick be used with linux and windows ?
You mean to transfer/share files between the two OS's?
Yes, one stick can be used, but it will need to be formatted in one of the few formats that Windows understands, such as FAT32 or FAT16 or NTFS.
If it's NTFS, you'll need the ntfs-3g package on your Linux, in order to read/write to the stick. ntfs-3g is more common these days and apparently works well, and it is probably included with your Linux already; if not, it's very likely that your package manager can get it for you.
Yes, one stick can be used, but it will need to be formatted in one of the few formats that Windows understands, such as FAT32 or FAT16 or NTFS.
Well, you can load drivers for ext3 or Reiser for Windows. I don't because when I dual boot Windows, I like it to be ignorant of my Linux file systems -- That way any malicious code can't easily damage my Linux partitions
@ ewaller -- I think I'd agree with you -- plus, I dunno how well I would trust the Win Ext drivers to be reliable and work without destroying something.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.