Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Mail rejected. DMARC check failed. OFR_515
[515] (in reply to end of DATA command)
I could imagine, that this is because procmail changes the return-path original to my server send path.
And dkim entry in the original mail is made for the original sender.
So I think if it would make sense to keep the original return-path in the forwarded mail.
Do you really want to inform the sender that your relaying attempt failed? Surely, that's something for you to sort out, not him.
thanks for your response.
i just want to get the forwarded email accepted and not refused.
i do not know why these certain mails from a bank are refused, when beeing forwarded by my server.
other users of procmail also complain, that procmail changes the return-path.
i want to forward the email like it is, just with an additional mark in the subject.
i thought this could be perhaps the reason. my server does not add a dkim when forwarding emails from other domains.
so the dkim of the original domain seems to be the problem.
It's been decades since I messed with procmail, but ISTR it was entirely set up by the config file and the delivery recipe. I'd Google for similar issues or post the configs here (relevant portions).
To judge by the deathly quiet on this, either everyone has moved over to another MDA or to another method altogether. I never use smtp anymore myself, but webmail.
Or. Adjust the DMARC validation on otherdomain.com to allow the copied messages.
Does it work when you forward manually?
Hi,
thanks for the input.
Manually forwarding causes same problem.
May be removing the dkim entry from the originally message could be a solution.
If the is no dkim inside, no dkim verification would be done, perhaps nomore error messages?
Sure the problem is at the recipient side.
Other users of this domain complain, that some emails do not arrive, with same error report like posted above.
So the forwarding is not the problem.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.