Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've never seen evidence of any order other than the ordering of the arguments on the command line. But note two things:
Unless you explicitly execute /bin/kill, you are probably getting your shell's built in kill command, so the result is dependent on your shell.
kill just sends a signal to each process. That signal will not be handled until that process is next scheduled for execution, and you have little control over what that sequence might be.
Thanks. That makes sense. So entry order really would not have control over the termination.
We were told to kill two processes at one time and we were wondering would the order make a difference as the were related.
It's especially true when you consider what each process might need to do to "terminate". The first process that gets the signal might have multiple I/O buffers to flush, and thus terminate some time after a second process that had less cleanup to do.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.