Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'm about to inherit a very old Pentium 166, 32MB ram that my girlfriend does not want to put to waste. I told her it would make a great Linux box because there are several Linux distros that it can handle.
Alas, I only know DamnSmallLinux, FeatherLinux, and Morphix. I'd like to have a mostly complete Linux distro with a GUI (I'm a GUI whore, don't give me console only distros, please) and so far Morphix looks like a winner. I'd like opinions from the experts though. Does anyone have any other suggestions? I'll mostly be doing browsing, FTPing, some image viewing possibly and playing music (XMMS can handle that just fine, methinks). Currently I'm a fan of FluxBox but XFCE looks like it would suit my tastes better (I've yet to check it out though...)
I have no knowledge of installing desktop environments but if I can have a good distro and someone teach me a very simple and easy way to install FluxBox/XFCE (or any other simple and quick desktop environment) on it, I'd be eternally grateful. Otherwise just recommend me already packaged small distros with FluxBox, etc. and I'll check em out.
Ready and easy-install distros are much preferred, however I'm not too shy to experiment if it would really make it worthwhile.
Slack and Debian are both good on older machines, as they require much less RAM to get installed. WHen using that machine, you'll likely be swapping a bit (see if there are any free RAM slots - most computer shops either chuck or give away the old 72 pin RAM these days). Vector is another good choice for an older machine like that.
/blastphemy on
...or you could check ebay for a cheap copy of Win 95 and raid the bargain bin of your local computer or pawn shop for all those fun DOS-based games (I know, Dosemu is a choice for this task too, but why work hard at it) we can't install on newer OS's
I have both Slackware 10.0 and Debian 3.0r2 Install CDs.
Which one of these would be easiest to install? I've only tried to install Slackware before.
Which one includes which window managers? I'm looking for WindowMaker, IceWM, FluxBox, and/or XFCE already included and basically a one-click process in the install (or wherever) just to add it and set it as default...
Apt-get is definitely a strong draw card for Debian. If you want easy administration, it would work well, although you could download and use swaret in the same manner for Slack. Your Slack version is definitely a lot newer, though, which has its attributes as well - like better hardware detection and a less time-consuming install. Of course, you could update Debian to the level of your Slack disks pretty easily as well.
I really want ease of use, I won't really be installing much applications, but if I do I would like to try to do it myself. I want to learn Linux. And this swaret you mention might also be good. So I'm better off with Slackware then, overall?
You'll start off with a more modern system with your Slack disks, but if you have a good internet connection, then Debian is easier to upgrade. I almost never download more than the first cd of any distro any more. But that's me. I like to start with the base system, upgrade to newest, and then add what I want from the mirrors. That leaves less upgrading in the end. The choice is yours. I'd probably go with Slack, since its newer (hey, the disks have a 2.6 kernel somewhere on them,. which Woody does not).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.