LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-11-2004, 12:04 AM   #1
ponkanMonster
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Philippines
Distribution: mandrake 10
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
libstdc++


libstdc++ differences ( post #1)

i am trying to install BitDefender in my laptop. However a dependency issue happened. the package needed the libstdc++-librc6.2-2.so.3....

well, i used the install packages in gui 'configure you computer' section and found out that i have to install libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.83mdk....

i have downloaded it already. however through the course of the search i can't believe that mandrake won't have a gcc library so i searched through the mandrakelinux.com and found out that i have the available packages:

libstdc++5-3.3.2-6mdk.i586
libstdc++5-devel-3.3.2-6mdk.i586

so i am not sure if i have a problem with my installers . if not, what is the difference with libstdc++5-..... and libstdc++2.10-....... ? how should i install the BitDefender? should i really need to install the libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.83mdk? would there be any conflict?

PS
yes, most of the guys told me that i dont need to have an antivirus. well, iam just safety conscious.
why BitDefender? -well i dont have much time when in comes to tweaking. a bit of a concern using fprot and clamav(i heard from reviews).

Last edited by ponkanMonster; 10-11-2004 at 12:13 AM.
 
Old 10-11-2004, 04:18 AM   #2
Andrew Benton
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Birkenhead/Britain
Distribution: Linux From Scratch
Posts: 2,073

Rep: Reputation: 64
libstdc++-librc6.2-2.so.3 is a shared library installed by gcc-2.9, an older version of gcc. It isn't installed if you install gcc-3
 
Old 10-11-2004, 04:34 AM   #3
ponkanMonster
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Philippines
Distribution: mandrake 10
Posts: 16

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
libstdc++

sir,

1. do you mean that the two libstdc's are different?
2. that the new versions are not 'backward' compatible?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FC4 doesn't have libstdc++.so.5 but libstdc++.so.6 baosheng Fedora 14 04-06-2008 10:08 AM
libstdc++.so.5 in RH 7.3 PauloP Linux - Software 1 07-23-2005 06:33 AM
libstdc++.so.6 MylesCLin Slackware 6 01-01-2005 06:52 AM
libstdc++.so.6 ecion Mandriva 12 12-09-2004 10:23 AM
mismatched rpm versions of libstdc++ and libstdc++-devel pcweirdo Linux - Software 8 11-29-2004 09:30 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration