Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I cannot seem to get a distro, " security auditor "to run on a dell 9300 laptop. If any can help please do.. Almost all distros I find will not run on this laptop and I already have it
You might check out http://tuxmobil.org/dell.html. There were 3 postings for the 9300. Not sure what the "security auditor" is. It could be something in your bios.
I have found that the newest big distros will work best on laptops. Try Mandriva, Suse, or Ubuntu. Dont be shy of the beta versions as they usually have the best driver support and wireless tools.
Try the live cd distros like PCLinuxOS, Mepis, and Kanotix. If they work ok in live mode, then it should be possible to install them without difficulty. These three distros are extremely easy to install.
I cannot seem to get a distro, " security auditor "to run on a dell 9300 laptop. If any can help please do.. Almost all distros I find will not run on this laptop and I already have it
didn't you try slackware ?????
i'll go with slackware 10.2 on it, however 10.0 has the advantage of being more secure
This thread has gone way off topic. The issue was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlandrigan
I cannot seem to get a distro to run on a dell 9300 laptop. If any can help please do.. Almost all distros I find will not run on this laptop and I already have it
( I removed the extra stuff from the original post)
I'm still waiting to hear back from rlandrigan as to what distro he has tried, and exactly what issues he is having.
Let's work together to find out what the issue is here and see if we can help this person. If you want to promote your distribution of choice, either wait for him to ask which distro he should use, or pick another thread, thanks.
This thread has gone way off topic. The issue was:
( I removed the extra stuff from the original post)
I'm still waiting to hear back from rlandrigan as to what distro he has tried, and exactly what issues he is having.
Let's work together to find out what the issue is here and see if we can help this person. If you want to promote your distribution of choice, either wait for him to ask which distro he should use, or pick another thread, thanks.
well... in not so many words....
put old wine in old wine bottles
put new wine in new
and both shall keep
this is an old proverb, but it speaks volumns...
the old have inherited wisdom
the new have all the energy
both want the best for each other
both need to work together to see which works best for each
now, more specifically, slackware 10.0 has been around longer, it has it's "issues" address. slackware 10.2 is a "decendant" of 10.0 that gets an excellent running start but is better prepared for the next generation of hardware... albeit some bumps in the road, kinks really, to get worked out....
now, more specifically, slackware 10.0 has been around longer, it has it's "issues" address. slackware 10.2 is a "decendant" of 10.0 that gets an excellent running start but is better prepared for the next generation of hardware... albeit some bumps in the road, kinks really, to get worked out....
i could go on and on, concerning this issue...
but it's really common sense.
- perry
So you are saying that since 10.0 has been around longer hence it is more secure. I don't think 10.0 and 10.2 are drastically different. The bumps/kinks you refer in your post are not security related bugs but usability related bugs. If for some reason I cannot use my wifi card with slackware, Is it really a security bug? Your post seems to suggest that it is. Your post says that 10.0 has its "issues" addressed...what issues, security or usability? Probably I am not aware of it...enlighten me.
Besides, newer version almost always has some more hardware compatibility than the previous version. This does not necessarily mean the newer version is giving up on legacy hardware. As you said, 10.2 is better prepared for the next generation of hardware because it is the need of the time and need of the users.
BTW, I have nothing against using 10.0 as against 10.2 but just that your statement doesn't quite hold up.
So you are saying that since 10.0 has been around longer hence it is more secure. I don't think 10.0 and 10.2 are drastically different. The bumps/kinks you refer in your post are not security related bugs but usability related bugs. If for some reason I cannot use my wifi card with slackware, Is it really a security bug? Your post seems to suggest that it is. Your post says that 10.0 has its "issues" addressed...what issues, security or usability? Probably I am not aware of it...enlighten me.
Besides, newer version almost always has some more hardware compatibility than the previous version. This does not necessarily mean the newer version is giving up on legacy hardware. As you said, 10.2 is better prepared for the next generation of hardware because it is the need of the time and need of the users.
BTW, I have nothing against using 10.0 as against 10.2 but just that your statement doesn't quite hold up.
-Tux,
you are correct in understanding that by "security" i'm referring to usability (context)
i was only using the terminology provided ("security auditor")....
I thank all of you for your quick reply and help offers. I am attaching the boot screen as it occurs when it dies as that probably will explain a lot better than I what is going on and causing my problem
Code: f3 66 5f 6d c3 8d b4 26 00 00 00 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 8b
<0>Kernel panic:Fatal exception in interrupt
In interrupt handler - not syncing
with 8 video modes to choose from, you would think at least one would work
I got this from remote-exploit.org/index.php/Main_Page and it is quite popular. If anyone can decipher this,,,,,
Hmmm. It looks specific to the cd that comes with the book. Have you tried running a different Linux distribution? Try downloading Knoppix Live CD and booting with it if you haven't.
When you try to boot from this cd, try passing acpi=off to the kernel. If you look at the CD contents, you should find a file called isolinux.cfg. It will have some predefined boot options that you can select. Just type the selection that wou want, along with acpi=off (i.e. "linux acpi=off").
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.