LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-14-2005, 10:24 AM   #1
slinkysteve
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
Kernal 2.6


Hi,

I've got the latest version of debian (3.1r0a I think) and have the option of installing it either as regular (2.4 kernal) or with the 2.6 kernal.

Is it worth installing it with the 2.6 kernal rather than going for the regual installation and what advantages would I have in installing the 2.6 version?

Thanks

Steve
 
Old 06-14-2005, 10:51 AM   #2
lowpingnoob
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, soon DSL (DSL backwards is LSD hahahaha)
Posts: 245

Rep: Reputation: 30
dont trust me on this, but I would use the newest kernel, then if it doesn't work, try the older one. Also, is that the newest version for your distro?
 
Old 06-14-2005, 10:51 AM   #3
harken
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Between the chair and the desk
Distribution: Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.13
Posts: 666

Rep: Reputation: 30
The 2.6 kernel is newer and it's more likely you'll get more of the newer hardware recognized than a 2.4 one.
But it's ok to install with the 2.4 kernel and then apt-get the latest version from Debian.

Oh, and BTW, it's spelled k-e-r-n-e-l, not kernal.
 
Old 06-14-2005, 11:23 AM   #4
slinkysteve
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Posts: 11

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Nice one. Thanks
 
Old 06-14-2005, 05:09 PM   #5
foo_bar_foo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,553

Rep: Reputation: 52
2.6 kernel is ALOT faster than the old one due to better scheduling and better memory management
 
Old 06-15-2005, 01:32 AM   #6
mohit dhawan
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 92

Rep: Reputation: 15
i think 2.6 is better since it will let u mount ntfs easily.
2.4 moght require some extra modules
 
Old 06-15-2005, 01:50 AM   #7
bretticus
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Debian 3.1
Posts: 36

Rep: Reputation: 15
I found it interesting that the Sarge install option for kernel 2.6x didn't seem to have support for my Perc4 RAID controller where the 2.4x version did. So I'm with the guy who mentioned something like, if it works, use it
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kernal modules on a Newly Compiled Kernal sethgeekx86 Slackware 4 05-04-2004 12:08 AM
How do you configure the kernal, overwriting the old version of the same kernal? sabaka Linux - Newbie 13 10-04-2003 11:00 AM
Help! Configuring Kernal failed, GRUB can't boot new kernal, help! sabaka Linux - Newbie 4 09-16-2003 10:12 PM
Kernal 2.4.22 newbie45 Linux - Software 4 09-08-2003 05:15 AM
kernal q linus1981 Linux - Newbie 1 03-06-2003 11:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration