Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The file is on the desktop and I tried ls Is and 1s all with no result.
I found a very good article on laptop logic website which had a step by step explanation to install from desktop and everything went perfectly untill the last step when the install file could not be opened. The minicom file I have was downloaded with a windows XP machine and maybe there are dependences not included in the file. I don't know a lot about it, Im just repeating what I have read on one of the multitude of websites I have visited in the last couple of days. I may be better of just installing a later version of ubuntu. Do they come with minicom included? Thank you for all your help, it is much appreciated, I will get the better of this one day.
Thanks, I'll try that. I thought the packet manager was only useful getting stuff from repositorys on the web. At the moment I'm away from home so it'll be a few days before I can attack this again. I'll keep you posted. Thanks again.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.