Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am brand new to Linux. I have read a bunch of stuff on the web and I am very interested in getting started. I think I am going to go with Mandrake but my question has more to do with the computer to put it on. I have a Dell PII 400 right now but for business reasons, I can't risk putting Linux on there and screwing anything up (I know, I know, it would probably be okay but I can't take the risk). So, I am looking for a used cheap (less than $400) computer to put Linux on. Would a PII 400 be sufficient? I am not into gaming that much, I really just want something that will run Linux at a reasonable speed. Any suggestions/corrections appreciated.
pentium 400 should do just fine.. if your going to be learning alot of command line, any machine can handle that.. I loaded redhat on a 75mhz once.. ran just fine...
my main fileserver running redhat 7.2 is a p!!! 450 and it runs like a dream. so yeah, a 400 would be good. :-)
and might i recommend redhat over mandrake? just a personal preference though... but i find redhat to be a little more in depth but just as easy to use.
i'd tell you to go with slackware if i could even handle it. but i'm still struggling myself. ;-)
like yesterday I got for my father a Pentium III 450 MHz with 128 Mb SDRAM for a symbolic price Dell, first of all I got rid off the sticker "Designed for MS Windows NT and MS Windows98"then I put Mandy 8.1 on it the same night, took about half an hour or so, just did basic install, put Powered by RedHat sticker (Mandy is a derivative of RedHat, isn't it?), and on weekend I am planning to add this PC to my home network.
I use SuSe with KDE and StarOffice52 on a Cx300 and everything is as fast as it was in Win98 on the same machine. (To be more precise: the Internet browsing and downloads are even faster)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.