Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
It won't mount in kernels 2.6.8.1 and up. Anybody else notice this? 2.6.8.1 kernels and up also have added two new options for vfat. If anyone even knows what I'm talking about, discuss it here please. Thanks.
Does anybody know if it's the default settings that are the problem, or if it's just a bug? Thanks. I'm wondering if it's just the settings because then I can just adjust accordingly, but if it's a bug, I'll wait until it's fixed.
Yeah, I'm really thinking it's a bug, or the two new features for vfat... See, the thing is, it'll work if I use 2.4.26 or 2.6.7, but as soon as I upgrade to 2.6.8.1 or 2.6.9-rc1, it won't work (and the two new features are also added to 2.6.8.1 and up). When I go back to 2.6.7 or lower, my fat32 will mount again, so it can't be my fstab. I've also tried manually mounting; doesn't work. Hoping they fix this bug soon, or, if not a bug, can someone tell me the proper settings for vfat in xconfig. Vfat support was working well before they added those two new settings. If you guys don't know what settings I'm talking about, just ask or check for yourself..
Hello All,
I have the same issue with mounting my vfat partitions under 2.6.8.
Error from DMESG:
hdb: IC35L120AVV207-0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: max request size: 1024KiB
hdb: 241254720 sectors (123522 MB) w/1821KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(33)
hdb: hdb1
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev hdb.
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev hdb.
Here is line from fstab :
/dev/hdb1 /mnt/samba/hdb vfat uid=1004,gid=100 0 2
This is Error MSG when trying to mount it manually :
mount -t vfat /dev/hdb1 /mnt/windows
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdb1,
or too many mounted file systems
When compiling 2.6.8 following options (regarding DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems ---> ) were chosen :
<*> MSDOS fs support
<*> VFAT (Windows-95) fs support
(437) Default codepage for FAT
(iso8859-1) Default iocharset for FAT
Everything worked just fine with the same settings on 2.4.26 27 28 but not on 2.6.8. plus I can mount it using -t msdos.
I too have this exact same problem. If anyone figures this out, please post! I would really like to be able to write proper(long) file names to my fat32 partition.
I don't think this is an obious mount syntax problem. I've tried just about everthing posible for vfat in the mount man pages. Is there an option some where else (Besides DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems --->) in the kernel config that needs enabling or disabling?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.