LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Complete CCNA, CCNP & Red Hat Certification Training Bundle
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2014, 04:53 PM   #16
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,388

Rep: Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199Reputation: 2199

Some people can live with MC, midnight commander. It would be one of the lowest ways to run a gui or sorts.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 05-02-2014, 05:10 PM   #17
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US, Earth, end border$! ◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on my cheapest, has been KDE or CLI but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 3,109
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840
Right. And: Aptitude, GPM, Nano, Links-browser, etc... are cool too.

Last edited by jamison20000e; 05-02-2014 at 05:17 PM.
 
Old 05-02-2014, 05:16 PM   #18
JWJones
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Cascadia
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 276Reputation: 276Reputation: 276
So, for the sake of comparison, here's the lightest WMs for both 32- and 64-bit. Note that most of the favorites called out in this thread (Xfce, LXDE, IceWM, Openbox, fluxbox, Enlightenment) do not show up in the top 20-30ish lightest WMs.

Some might argue that there's a balance here between minimalism and functionality. I suppose it all depends on your needs. I personally find that DEs and many WMs simply have a lot of stuff and bloat that I just don't need. I want to quickly open a terminal window or launch a program and get down to business, without having to use a mouse. I don't care about icons, panels, whiz-bang effects, launchers, etc. I get enough of that using Macs professionally all day.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	wm_64bit.png
Views:	16
Size:	118.4 KB
ID:	15404   Click image for larger version

Name:	wm_32bit.png
Views:	12
Size:	93.4 KB
ID:	15405  

Last edited by JWJones; 05-02-2014 at 05:18 PM.
 
Old 05-02-2014, 07:01 PM   #19
metaschima
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2013
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,982

Rep: Reputation: 490Reputation: 490Reputation: 490Reputation: 490Reputation: 490
Don't sort by vsize, sort by rss. vsize is highly variable and doesn't truly represent the RAM used.
 
Old 05-02-2014, 11:01 PM   #20
JWJones
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: Cascadia
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 276Reputation: 276Reputation: 276
^ Thanks, this is good to know! I went back and sorted by rss, and indeed the results were different. The same WMs in the top 20-30, just in different order now. Some of my favs are represented amongst the lightest: sithwm, larswm, evilwm. Just get yourself a nice .Xresources file, and you can make these all look great.
 
Old 05-03-2014, 12:37 PM   #21
DavidMcCann
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: London
Distribution: CentOS, Salix
Posts: 4,165

Rep: Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223Reputation: 1223
The reasons why some of the lightest window managers have not been recommended are

1. They often require a radical rethink of the way you work. Icewm is the smallest that looks like the sort of environment most of us are familiar with. Look here:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/review...page/15/sort/7

2. They may have odd habits. For example, wmii uses Alt by default for its keyboard shortcuts, so that has to be altered or most programs won't work.

3. They have to installed as replacements for the standard interface issued by a distro, which then has to be configured to use it this may be easy or not. Then, unlike desktops, they don't generate their own menus, so you have that to do.

4. If you use a GUI that doesn't come as a default, the quality of the implementation may not be good. Distros like OpenSUSE and Fedora can't deliver a good Xfce, let alone a window manager. Slackware (and hence Salix) seems to be the only distro where all the GUIs are of the same quality.
 
Old 05-03-2014, 12:46 PM   #22
Enindu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2014
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 13
Xfce lighter than GNOME and KDE. [And Cinnamon, Unity etc.] But it's heavier than LXDE, IceWM and all tiling WMs. I suggest to you, use Openbox or PekWM. Super light and easy to configure than other tiling WMs.
 
Old 05-03-2014, 12:48 PM   #23
jamison20000e
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: ...uncanny valley... infinity\1975; (randomly born:) Milwaukee, WI, US, Earth, end border$! ◣◢┌∩┐ Fe26-E,e...
Distribution: any GPL that works well on my cheapest, has been KDE or CLI but open... http://goo.gl/NqgqJx &c ;-)
Posts: 3,109
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840Reputation: 840
This thread has got me exploring, most I have used but my love for Window-Maker has been rekindled. (Not necessarily for s I guess?)

Last edited by jamison20000e; 05-03-2014 at 01:04 PM.
 
Old 05-03-2014, 04:23 PM   #24
cesarbergara
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2012
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Distribution: Debian, Suse, Mandrake,
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Hi. There are a lot of goods lights windows manager. I am using blackbox (it is really light, solid and easy to configure and personalized). Is really simple and quick. It is good for you to navigate with firefox or other browser.
Another lights windows managers are: afterstep, wmaker, fvwm1, fvwm2, fvwm95 (fvwms are olds but goods).
Try them. They are a good solution for navigate in internet and/or to use a PC with little ram and chip.
Have you a nice day.
 
Old 05-03-2014, 04:45 PM   #25
fogpipe
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Distribution: Slackware 64 -current,
Posts: 550

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194
Rox Filer is a good fast capable file manager that does drag and drop and displays desktop icons. Fluxbox is a lightweight full featured window manager. When you put them together you have an environment that is almost instantaneously responsive on any hardware and looks good too.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Lightest distro with Gnome bennypr0fane Linux - Distributions 3 05-30-2013 12:01 PM
Lightest window manager and desktop environement for Ubuntu Server. Edmundajw Linux - Server 2 05-10-2012 05:49 PM
Which distro is the lightest? msuleyman Linux - Software 5 09-16-2009 04:22 PM
lightest distro for vmware N_A_J_M Linux - General 10 07-01-2005 05:29 PM
lightest slackware desktop stickfun Slackware 6 04-10-2005 01:15 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration