Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
They compiled and installed. When I restarted X, everything was much faster than before(Opera would bog down on flash video, but after installing the latest ATI drivers, everything is very very smooth).
My problem is I can't set my graphics display to 1280x1024.
I've used ATICONFIG to set a graphics mode of 1280x1024, but when I use KDE's configure display, it doesn't give me an option for 1280x1024. 1280x1024 is the ONLY option in xorg.conf.
In my searching I've found this on the Ubuntu forum, which seems to be my issue. It doesn't matter what I set up in xorg.conf file, it ignores it.
It references a file called "kcmrandrrc", which doesn't seem to exist on my system. I am not sure where KDE is getting the 320x200, 320x240, 400x300,...,640x480, 800x600 and 1024x768 graphics modes. It's not from xorg.conf.
In Slackware there is a command "xorgsetup". It did work for me. I don't know whether it is your 64bit system or not. If yes try it. To know your current resolution enter the follwing command in konsole
Turns out, the EDID information from the monitor tops out at 1024x768 @ 85Hz. The monitor can do 1280x1024 at 60Hz, but that isn't contained in the EDID data in the monitor.
I have to set the 1280x1024 resolution in X manually, then I should be able to use it, but I need to figure out all the data required by X to do it.
Well, after an entire evening of researching, I believe the problem is that the EDID does not find/display 1280x1024 so it doesn't detect that graphics mode. By default with the newest xorg configured monitors are ignored.
It doesn't seem to matter what graphics modes or changes I make to xorg.conf, nothing really changes, unless I delete it. When I delete it, it doesn't use the ATi proprietary driver and I can get 1280x1024 again. Once I configure it to use fgrlx, I can't get it to manually change anything.
It seems to be a common problem along all of the newest distros using the latest xorg. Most people either give up and live with it, don't use the driver or use the radeonhd driver.
Going through the xorg log file, it does seem like it picks up the 1280x1024, but why it doesn't display it as an option, I don't know.
Still playing around with it. I could change the display settings dynamically with XRANDR and I was able to add 1280x1024 as a graphics mode, but XRANDR still won't change the graphics mode to 1280x1024 because it says the largest I can go is 1024x1024.
fgrlx detects 1280x1024 at 65Hz, although windows does it at 60Hz and xrandr doesn't recognize it because of the EDID.
I don't know if this works with fglrx, but with the open source drivers you can force a resolution by adding a modeline and using the PreferredMode option. It *should* work with any driver that supports xrandr 1.2, but fglrx is a bit iffy when it comes to xrandr 1.2 :-)
For example, adding this to the Monitor section should force the driver to use 1280x1024@60:
That modeline was generated with cvt. You can obviously change it as needed.
Again, I can't guarantee this will work, but it might be worth a shot.
As for fglrx vs. radeon... The card is supported by 2D only with the radeon driver in Slackware 13, so if the OP needs 3D acceleration, fglrx is the way to go (unless the OP is willing to start compiling development code).
As for fglrx vs. radeon... The card is supported by 2D only with the radeon driver in Slackware 13, so if the OP needs 3D acceleration, fglrx is the way to go (unless the OP is willing to start compiling development code).
I don't know if this works with fglrx, but with the open source drivers you can force a resolution by adding a modeline and using the PreferredMode option. It *should* work with any driver that supports xrandr 1.2, but fglrx is a bit iffy when it comes to xrandr 1.2 :-)
For example, adding this to the Monitor section should force the driver to use 1280x1024@60:
That modeline was generated with cvt. You can obviously change it as needed.
Again, I can't guarantee this will work, but it might be worth a shot.
As for fglrx vs. radeon... The card is supported by 2D only with the radeon driver in Slackware 13, so if the OP needs 3D acceleration, fglrx is the way to go (unless the OP is willing to start compiling development code).
Adam
Thanks Adamn, I've been down that road and it doesn't work. It totally ignores any settings I put in the Monitor section. My slackware comes with xrandr 1.3, but I don't know if that makes a difference.
I was able to use xrandr to add 1280x1024 but when I try to select that graphics mode it says I can't go any higher than 1024x1024.
fgrlx does see 1280x1024.
I don't NEED 3D, but it would be nice to have at some point.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
