Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hello! I am looking to try Linux on an older PC. It is a Celeron 400MHz, 256MB RAM. So I need a distribution that will run acceptably on an old system like this, but will also be good for someone with no prior Linux/Unix experience. Any reccomendations? Thanks
P.S. I have tried Fedora Core 4, but the install wouldn't work for some reason.
Any Linux distribution will run fine. It's what you're going to run on top of it is what matters, applications that depend on resources, like X, Gnome, KDE, etc.. I'm a Slacker, so I recommend Slackware, too. Find one that you think you'll like, if you don't like it, download another one.
I think that, as a Windows user curious about linux, I would definitely want KDE or GNOME going. I have no idea what the difference is between those two, though.
I think that, as a Windows user curious about linux, I would definitely want KDE or GNOME going. I have no idea what the difference is between those two, though.
I wouldn't use either of those with the amount of RAM and CPU power you have, IMHO. You might want to try Fluxbox, Blackbox instead, and they should be included with the Linux distribution you chose to download. KDE is a resource hog, as is Gnome. Fluxbox and Blackbox are light weight. You'll get better performance out of one of those two.
I know squat about Linux but when I was first testing out distros a week ago, I tried Damn Small Linux on a Celeron 400 w/64RAM and it ran like a hot damn - very fast.
I did take a look at the Vectorlinux website but I'm wary of the fact that so many things are only available in the deluxe version.
Just download the package from the corresponding slack release from the slackware website. Example: Vector 4.3 is Slack 9.1 compatible.
Trust me, for an older computer, Vector is it. It's what makes it usable , at a decend speed again. I run 2 computers on Vector, with the normal (not Deluxe) version.
So I had a change of heart and put on Damn Small Linux (HD install). I'm quite pleased with it; there are a few annoyances since it's meant as a LiveCD distribution but it runs really well. Win98 had toasted the computer to the point of hardware failure; it's now working just fine.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.