[SOLVED] Can I alias a device for the mount command in RedHat 9?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Can I alias a device for the mount command in RedHat 9?
I have a program which mounts /dev/sdb1 for which I lack the source code. This device does not exist on my RedHat 9 system and I want to create /dev/sdb1 such that it's an alias for /dev/hdb1 Can I do this? with MAKEDEV?
I need to have an alias which will allow it to mount, not create a symbolic link to an already mounted directory.
i.e. 'mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/harddrive' should actually mount /dev/hdb1
Can we back up and ask why on earth you're running rh9 in the first place?? That's SO old it's unreal.
Software does not suffer from rust, corrosion, oxidation, or other factors usually associated with aging hardware. The application is an embedded product with no keyboard, no video, no mouse, no gui for which the source code cannot be located. Updating the kernel to 2.6.x caused the application to crash. rh9 is the highest revision I could find which allows the system to run.
Cool. As you have reasons then that's just groovy, you'd be amazed how many people think that redhat 9 is the newest version as it's the highest number associated with redhat.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.