Broadcom wireless driver support (lack of) across all Linux
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Have you tried (I am assuming you are using Debian) this download: Debian with NonFree Drivers . It may have the drivers included for your broadcom card.
When I dabbled with Debian (I use Mint now, I just like all my stuffs to work out of the box) I used this Wiki on Debian and got off to a good start.
Then when my laptop with broadcom died, I only get ones with Intel wireless...
BW/UserX - No they're not free, I get that. Appreciate the patronizing tone! ;-) But their availability on repositories is no secret... That's the big joke.
Thank you BB2 and Ardvark. If God is in charge, She's been pretty mean to me on this journey. So, with all due respect for any and all belief systems, I'd like to keep Her out of it. And I am SO frustrated that it'll be a while b4 I crack open the Linux machines again, at which time I'll post the terminal output.
Thanks, all, for the willingness to help.
- JW
like the others have said it is a legal thing, so to keep from being sued they have set it up as such the way it is set up to get them installed with out having to worry about getting sued. get it?
This topic is all over the internet and on messages boards as to why. One should just feel lucky that at least they are able to get them so they can be installed, else a lot of people would have to be without WIFI or having to buy new wifi hardware.
The card the OP has is supported by the broadcom-sta-dkms package. Obviously, it would require enabling non-free and being online to install, or preparing a USB drive with all the requisite packages on (I actually do this as my machine I had with that card didn't have ethernet at all) to install from. It's a PITA, but I've found it actually works REALLY well with the newer (read - 4.0+) kernel in Debian. It was OK with 3.16 if a bit flaky with losing connections, but was much more reliable with the newer 4.3 & now 4.4 kernels from backports before I put Windows 10 back on to sell that laptop.
Last edited by Timothy Miller; 04-05-2016 at 05:23 PM.
MX-15 is running very nicely, like a high mileage Avalon (in line with my most optimistic expectations for a 9 yo Gateway). Thank you for the recommendation.
Last edited by JohnWWiley; 04-05-2016 at 06:42 PM.
like the others have said it is a legal thing, so to keep from being sued they have set it up as such the way it is set up to get them installed with out having to worry about getting sued. get it?
This topic is all over the internet and on messages boards as to why. One should just feel lucky that at least they are able to get them so they can be installed, else a lot of people would have to be without WIFI or having to buy new wifi hardware.
I'll appreciate it if you don't "get-it" or "got-it" me again, please. I understand the legal and licensing situation quite well. But perhaps I'm being too nuanced for you. My discomfiture is with the hypocrisy of an obvious end-run around the issue(s) and the entrenched mentalities involved, not to mention the higher philosophical discussion around intellectual property to begin with, and whether "laws" should even be a thread in the cloth. Get it?
Last edited by JohnWWiley; 04-05-2016 at 07:33 PM.
This is off-topic, but still germane. If the moderators here do any moderating, please move it as you see appropriate.
To anyone: If I met you at a seminar or symposium or conference, or in a class, for the first time, there's a certain respectful tome I would strike. While (and since) certain cues simply don't come to the screen, if you wouldn't use the words in person, I'd humbly submit you shouldn't type them. "Keyboard warriors.. ".
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.