LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Newbie
User Name
Password
Linux - Newbie This Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question? If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2009, 11:50 PM   #16
joseph2020
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 235

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Wow!, what a great set of responses thank you all for your input. I will definetely look into slackware.

dunix I am using SimplyMepis 8 now and it does work well except I can't get the sound to work, so one of the options I am considering is going back to 7 which worked flawlessly and was in my opininon faster (although some people disagree with that). I just didn't like the outdated firefox and thunderbird.

Thanks again to all responders.
 
Old 11-21-2009, 12:08 AM   #17
lwasserm
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Baltimore Md
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: 41
I disagree somewhat with most of the previous posts. I ran ubuntu 8.04 on an old compaq armada with a 650MHz Pentium 3 and never experienced any serious performance problems. I did have the ram maxed out at 512MB. If you can up the ram in your laptop any modern linux distro will probably work acceptably. You may not be able to run all the popular special video effects depending on specific hardware.

True, performance won't be as quick as with some of the lightweight distros mentioned, but it may be a fair tradeoff for your needs.
 
Old 11-21-2009, 02:47 AM   #18
Thelionroars
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 1
Are you set on KDE? It's got a rep for being more resource hungry.

My laptop is 800Mhz Celeron, 256Mb Ram and 20GB hard drive. I run Ubuntu 9.04 using ext4 (available as an option during install), with a few programs removed from startup (bluetooth, evolution) and with automatic updates turned off. Other than that, it's stock, and it runs fine.
 
Old 11-21-2009, 09:41 AM   #19
culaterout
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: colorado
Distribution: Debian, Arch Linux, Linux Mint, Ubuntu, Fedora, Suse, Mepis, Redhat, Sayabon, mandrake and android (
Posts: 189

Rep: Reputation: 29
Resources is what your aiming to keep high or you will tax your cpu...

BSD is an option ,but I don't know your user level and for me to suggest

SLACKWARE, BSD, DEBIAN or any no graphical install would be a bad idea...

You could also consider...

Ubuntu with e17 or one windows managers...

Arch linux...

Maryan Linux...

Puppy Linux..

OpenSolaris

Gos...

CrunchBang Linux

you could even use a netbook remix....

there are a total of 147 different distro's you could use and probably more... at distrowatch.com
 
Old 11-21-2009, 09:51 AM   #20
mudangel
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 267

Rep: Reputation: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by culaterout View Post
SLACKWARE, BSD, DEBIAN or any no graphical install would be a bad idea...
Slackware's installer's pretty easy to work with, and I think Debian's is similar.
I've seen some low-resource machines fail with graphical installers.
 
Old 11-21-2009, 09:55 AM   #21
eeeBu
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Distribution: Ubuntu karmic koala
Posts: 71

Rep: Reputation: 16
why hasnt anyone recommended ubuntu 9.10 karmic koala?

its a good update from the 9.04 version and works better on netbooks, even with compiz
 
Old 11-22-2009, 06:42 AM   #22
joseph2020
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Distribution: Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 235

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
topic closed

Thanks to all responders...will make a choice soon.
 
Old 11-22-2009, 11:04 AM   #23
MrCode
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 864
Blog Entries: 31

Rep: Reputation: 148Reputation: 148
Quote:
why hasnt anyone recommended ubuntu 9.10 karmic koala?

its a good update from the 9.04 version and works better on netbooks, even with compiz
I think even netbooks have CPUs that are faster than 700MHz. Not by much, though.
 
Old 11-22-2009, 12:25 PM   #24
smeezekitty
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Washington U.S.
Distribution: M$ Windows / Debian / Ubuntu / DSL / many others
Posts: 2,330

Rep: Reputation: 227Reputation: 227Reputation: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by eeeBu View Post
why hasnt anyone recommended ubu ntu 9.10 karmic koala?

its a good update from the 9.04 version and works better on netbooks, even with compiz
Generally for operating systems, you want to stay a version behind.
(unless you want to simulate the crashes and errors of windows
 
Old 11-22-2009, 01:30 PM   #25
eeeBu
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Distribution: Ubuntu karmic koala
Posts: 71

Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCode View Post
I think even netbooks have CPUs that are faster than 700MHz. Not by much, though.
woops, my bad....

Quote:
Originally Posted by smeezekitty View Post
Generally for operating systems, you want to stay a version behind.
(unless you want to simulate the crashes and errors of windows
Yeh the more i use 9.10 the more im searching into other distros lol

speed is fine but there are some teething problems that you can notice. One that is worrying me now is when streaming clips or big pages with lots of pics. It gets jerky and with the streaming clips the screen sometimes flashes in some places. Makes me feel like im damaging my netbook! :/
 
Old 11-22-2009, 02:24 PM   #26
sundialsvcs
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 7,482

Rep: Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377Reputation: 2377
Well, as you can see, all you'll get from your question is an laundry list of distributions.

Simply be selective when you make your installation: don't install "everything." And let's face it: "underpowered," these days, is a very relative term.
 
Old 12-21-2009, 03:54 PM   #27
vigi
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: australia
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 184

Rep: Reputation: 28
No one has suggested lxde-slackware (or ubuntu9.10)?
I am running lxde slackware13 on a nb100 toshiba netbook and it runs like a rabbit.

My son has just been given an IBM R30 thinkpad-1Ghz cpu 256MBram 10GB hdd. I opted to install xubuntu 9.10, as it was the easiest approach with a CD drive. (It would not boot from a USB stick). I then installed lxde from the repository and deleted xfce. Xfce does not work well with only 256MB of ram. After using slackware for 9months, I am now about to replace Ubuntu on this old notebook. Slackware knowledge remains consistent, where as Ubuntu changes from one edition to the next. My son will have to learn slackware.
 
Old 12-21-2009, 05:13 PM   #28
worm5252
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Atlanta
Distribution: CentOS, RHEL, HP-UX, OS X
Posts: 567

Rep: Reputation: 57
This could easily turn into a which distro is best flame war. On that note I am a Debian based guy, but I try a lot of distros. I have an old Dell Latitude C800, 866Mhz, 512MB Ram, and 20GB HDD with 32MB Video. I found Fluxbuntu worked great but I don't know if it is still around. Kubuntu was ok, Suse did ok. Right now I have Debian Lenny 32 bit with XFCE running on it. I didn't really enjoy slackware too much so I didn't really give it a fair go. Never try BSD or gentoo.

Right now all I am using it for is to browse the web, remotely accessing my other machines and servers, or a scripting/coding box. Most of the time if I do scripting I do it locally but coding I usually do that remotely through SSH.

On an older machine I like kubuntu and fluxbuntu a lot. Made the machine a decent machine again.
 
Old 12-21-2009, 05:33 PM   #29
thorkelljarl
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,788

Rep: Reputation: 211Reputation: 211Reputation: 211
My bid...

http://wiki.dennyhalim.com/opensuse-minimal-desktop
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: NPX-9000 UMPC is inexpensive but underpowered LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-07-2008 10:50 PM
Laptop keyboard becomes inoperably underpowered after s2ram operation Le Beastie Linux - Hardware 3 06-20-2008 04:37 AM
LXer: SAM Linux 2007 targets older, underpowered PCs LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-23-2007 11:46 AM
A local wireless network for sharing files (linux desktop+linux laptop+mac laptop) whyatt Linux - Wireless Networking 1 11-01-2005 04:17 PM
creating a bare-bare-barebones system for an underpowered laptop orange400 Linux - General 3 06-15-2004 06:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration