Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I am starting to write and learn about redundant systems.
Iam try to make a redundant system from a big system in the company that it does not have any redundancy right now.
There are a few concepts I dont understand.
Systems and technologies like:
- HA,
- Heartbeat,
- Pacemaker,
- DRBD,
- iETD,
- AoE,
- ESX,
- LVM,
- iSCSI,
--> can all this work together?
--> are there any reviews what is better?
--> are there many concepts to choose from (to bild an redundant server system)?
--> ?
I would like someone to tell me the basics and a few comments that will guide me what to search so I can understand better.
I know a little bit what these components means: High Awaliability (system design), DRBD (replicate data betwwen servers), Heartbeat (checks servers if they are still alive), Pacemaker (almost like Heartbeat), OCFS 2 (cluster file system from Oracle), iSCSI (network transport...), LVM (logical volume manager), AoE (ATA over ethernet, standard base protocol), ESXi (VMVare virtual base servers).
Ok I understand that we can set up how will system be redundant,
is it going to be active/active, active/pasive,
clustering: does it means that data is gruped in clusters, so it checks if all data is clustered the same on all servers?
Still I can not figured it out how system must be set for perfomrance or redundant.
I am searhing on internet if there is any review what is better?
There are categories
Cluster Filesystems (below will replicate local disks each other)
DRBD (replicate data at Block level)
OCFS2
GFS
External Storage communiate via Fibra channel or network protocol
iSCSI (basically you are using storage array as your local disk)
AoE (same logic but more lighweight)
LVM (filesystem nothing to do with HA)
ESXi (VMware Virtualization nothing to do with HA)
If you see above technology, here is where data store
DRBD - both machines has identical data
OCFS2, GFS - every machines has identical data
iSCSI, AOE, SAN - apparently data is stored at outside storage
What is better?
It is really depends on your requirements.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.