Archive Managers: How compatible across different distributions?
Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Archive Managers: How compatible across different distributions?
I use the (GUI) archive managers of Linux Mint, LMDE and Linux Lite.
I 'tar' files with them and I do not see much difference between them.
But I'd like to know if it would be possible to, for example, create an archive (tar.gz) on Linux Mint and then extract the files in that archive
on Linux Lite.
Whether such an intention makes logical sense is another question, just like to know if there would be technical problems with doing that.
This is an odd question - people share tar.gz files all the time, across a myriad of different OSes, and have done for decades.
A tar.gz is simply a tar file with gzip compression applied. Both of these things are standards, thus if you create a file with standards-compliant software, all other standards-compliant software will be able to read that file. Any failure would be a bug in one of the pieces of software involved.
Distribution: openSUSE, Raspbian, Slackware. Previous: MacOS, Red Hat, Coherent, Consensys SVR4.2, Tru64, Solaris
Posts: 2,803
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by boughtonp
Any failure would be a bug in one of the pieces of software involved.
I'm sure there's an XKCD toon that covers archives. (If not, there ought to be. )
In a previous life, I routinely had to move patch files received from a major software vendor's Tru64-based application that were, in theory, in a tar.gz format but couldn't be read on the Tru64 system until: 1.) I moved the archive from Tru64 to Linux, 2.) unpack and re-tar/gzip, and then 3.) move them back onto the Tru64 box. Then the native tar could read them. Fluky problem to say the least. (Only one reason I despised working with that software vendor.)
The archive manager is just a GUI front end to the GNU tar utility which should be the same on just about any linux distribution. As posted a tar archive should be OS agnostic i.e. any OS i.e. Unix, linux, MacOS, Windows, VMS etc.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.