Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
an advise is needed
i am finding problem in configuring my old fashion red hat 7.0 server
so i need to up grade and after yr experience what to choose as a software between red had or suse or else .
option needed :
session limitation .
bandwidth limitation .
locking ip to mac addresses .
squid to be used as cache engine .
thx elie
Re: red had or suse is best to be used as a server
Quote:
so i need to up grade and after yr experience what to choose as a software between red had or suse or else .
option needed :
session limitation .
bandwidth limitation .
locking ip to mac addresses .
squid to be used as cache engine .
Well ANYTHING listed here doesn't rely on a specific distribution! You could go with (almost) ANY distribution if you want those. There's no significant difference between RedHat and S.u.S.E in those things ...
I hate these types of questions cause there is no real answer. Setting up a server is dependant upon the admin and whoever sets it up. Like markus said, any distro will work, its just how you set it up to work for you. They are all in the same essence with any distro that you decide to use.
whish one of these too is easyer to configure for a newbees
knowing that i have no back ground for linux , only a small experience in RH 7.0 sofar is working good but still i cant in eny way to deal with the cbq .
and yes nick
about the mandrake i know it is good too but how can i shoose between them and i dont know nothing about them?
so marcus
you mean it dosent matter whish softwar i use the specific distribution is what dose matter
RedHat was once built as a server-oriented distro, so i would recommend it and you have some experiences with it, too.
SuSE has Yast, but that doesn't fit everybody.
Download all the the Distros and benchmark their network protcols by real-life situations. Though it is sometimes go with the distro that you know how to setup.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.