Quote:
Originally Posted by JASlinux
Can you put your understanding in general terms?
|
Wireguard has a much, much smaller code base. Thus all even if all other factors were equal, that is an advantage because if code is not there it cannot break. There is even an implementation baked into OpenBSD base, which speaks a lot to the auditability and clarity. There are ports for Android and MacOS too.
Last I checked, Wireguard has defaulted to stronger algorithms. In the case of proprietary competition, last I checked, most did not even offer those stronger algorithms as an option.
On the usage side, setup is much simpler, as you can see from the guides.
The connection process is apparently simpler, thus faster and less error prone.
Apparently it transfers data faster than the others.
Don't take my word for it though. Unlike m$ products, it is allowed to evaluate and benchmark this software so you can find many reviews and guides out there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASlinux
Can you put your understanding in general terms?
To spare Ubuntu, I think PPTP-only builtin is the same with Microsoft & I know it is in Android.
Esoteric is the reason why later alternatives are safer.
|
PPTP, like other m$ services, insecure by design:
https://www.schneier.com/academic/ar..._of_mic_1.html
https://www.schneier.com/academic/ar...is_of_mic.html
Notice those posts are from the 1990s. L2TP is basically just a name change and just about as burdened with security hole.