Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I was wondering if there is some sort of a freeware program to help with learning about networks... I have seen such programs for electronic circuits but couldnīt find anything. I am having problems understanding exactly how to use subnet masks and then calculate how many hosts you could have with the mask even though I have read quite a few articles which are supposed to explain it.
There are IP calculators...just google ip calc and you will find tons of them.
If you want to know how many hosts you can have with a given netmask then take the count the number of bit positions with corresponding zeros represented by 'n', raise two to that number and subtract '2':
255.255.255.224
=
11111111.11111111.11111111.11100000 (five zeros)
=
2^5 - 2 (raise 2 to the number of zeros - 2)
=
32 - 2
=
30
To do the number of networks it is the exact opposite. Instead of using the number of zeros you use the number of ones. And you don't subtract two, but that depends on if you are doing classfull or classless ip addressing. I will use classless since that is what everyone uses nowadays. Read up on RFC1519.
Take class of address:
First octet rule -
0-127 Class A Default Netmask 255.0.0.0
128-171 Class B Default Netmask 255.255.0.0
127-223 Class C Default Netmask 255.255.255.0
Number of bits subnetted:
IPADDR=10.0.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.0.0
Default netmask since the IPADDR starts with 10 would be 255.0.0.0
Therefore, you borrowed 8 bits to get the 255.255.0.0.
To do the number of networks it is the exact opposite. Instead of using the number of zeros you use the number of ones. And you don't subtract two, but that depends on if you are doing classfull or classless ip addressing. I will use classless since that is what everyone uses nowadays. Read up on RFC1519.
Take class of address:
First octet rule -
0-127 Class A Default Netmask 255.0.0.0
128-171 Class B Default Netmask 255.255.0.0
127-223 Class C Default Netmask 255.255.255.0
Number of bits subnetted:
IPADDR=10.0.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.0.0
Default netmask since the IPADDR starts with 10 would be 255.0.0.0
Therefore, you borrowed 8 bits to get the 255.255.0.0.
2^8 =
256 subnets possible
Hi,
There are 2 different approach in IP adressing i think. One says that B Class is between 128-191 and other is as u say 128-171. Which one is right?
Class 'A' networks are 0-127 in the first octet defined bitwise:
0xxxxxxx
Class 'B' networks are 128-191 in the first octet defined bitwise:
10xxxxxx
Class 'C' networks are 192-223 in the first octet defined bitwise:
110xxxxx
Therefore, it must be this way. No other scheme.
Cheers,
Justin
Well actually i agree with this one already but;
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcookeman
To do the number of networks it is the exact opposite. Instead of using the number of zeros you use the number of ones. And you don't subtract two, but that depends on if you are doing classfull or classless ip addressing. I will use classless since that is what everyone uses nowadays. Read up on RFC1519.
Take class of address:
First octet rule -
0-127 Class A Default Netmask 255.0.0.0
128-171 Class B Default Netmask 255.255.0.0
127-223 Class C Default Netmask 255.255.255.0
Number of bits subnetted:
IPADDR=10.0.0.0
NETMASK=255.255.0.0
Default netmask since the IPADDR starts with 10 would be 255.0.0.0
Therefore, you borrowed 8 bits to get the 255.255.0.0.
2^8 =
256 subnets possible
u say "128-171 Class B" i didnt understand this one. Also i found this spesification in some other sources (very few). What is the point of this spesification?
u say "128-171 Class B" i didnt understand this one. Also i found this spesification in some other sources (very few). What is the point of this spesification?
Thanx again
I was drunk when I posted that. Obviously, I made a typo, but I don't remember as it was quite long ago.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.