Linux - NetworkingThis forum is for any issue related to networks or networking.
Routing, network cards, OSI, etc. Anything is fair game.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've been searching google for various combinations of ddns, dns, and dhcp for a few days, yet seem unable to find an answer to my question.
Is it possible to have a Red Had dhcp server update a Windows 2000 dns server with a hostname/address whenever it assigns a lease?
All the info I've found so far about Dynamic DNS seems to assume, or imply that the DNS server in question is using BIND, and on the same box. Is it possible to do what I want, or am I dreaming?
Just point the primary entry (mentioned in my reply) to the IP address of your MS DNS server and see if nsupdate works. I would think if there is going to be a problem, its going to be with the KEY. i.e. kerberos
There isn't an active directory server in this particular network, in fact, there is no centralised administration at all (we have about 130 users in a workgroup model). The server was originally set up as DNS to look up internet addresses and cache them, it's only recently that I've begun to use dns for local network addressing. Previously, it was all WINS for local addressing.
I'll try your suggestion though, and let you know the results.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.