Is it possible to get an *old* laptop to use a wireless card?
Linux - Laptop and NetbookHaving a problem installing or configuring Linux on your laptop? Need help running Linux on your netbook? This forum is for you. This forum is for any topics relating to Linux and either traditional laptops or netbooks (such as the Asus EEE PC, Everex CloudBook or MSI Wind).
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is it possible to get an *old* laptop to use a wireless card?
From the "This is probably wishful thinking" department.
I've got an old Acer laptop that I bought in college, the only (functional) laptop I've got. (Unfortunately I don't have the machine at hand at the moment, otherwise I'd give you the specs...) I would like to use it just to do some simple Perl hacking and to check email with mutt. Then I could get away from this desktop, where I spend 90% of my life, and go to a coffee house or something.
So I actually have two questions:
1) What distro would you recommend as the easiest way to install a *really simple* Linux, one that doesn't use too much memory? I've tried installing Redhat, thinking that perhaps it would detect the limitations, but that didn't happen. I couldn't get Knoppix to run either, though I'd really rather have a system on the harddrive.
2) Assuming the drivers are correct, Linux will see a wireless card just as if it were plugged into Ethernet, right? So if I got a $50 wireless PCMCIA card for this old laptop, I could theoretically get online at one of these places with an access point, and do my email, ssh, etc.
Am I totally off my rocker?
heee i like those.
-pat
Last edited by fieldmethods; 09-11-2003 at 12:57 PM.
I have not messed around with wireless cards, but presumably as long as you have the appropriate support in the kernel (and have the accompanying pcmcia-cs modules), a wireless card should work on just about anything.
Redhat is probably the furthest you can get from a "really simple" Linux distribution I would suggest one of the more DIY distros such as Slackware or Debian. Not using too much memory is mostly a function of how much stuff you install, and how many services you run. I don't know what kind of resources Perl demands, but for basic networking and email support, you don't need more than 4MB RAM.
What kind of CPU, RAM and HD are you working with? A minimal Slackware with what you're describing could pretty easily fit in 150-200MB of hard drive.
depending on how old your laptop is, you might not be able to use newer PCMCIA cards (iirc its 16bit vs 32 bit PCMCIA bus that you need to watch out for)....I used to have an old Dell latitude (p133) running Peanut Linux and I bought a 32bit network card that just wouldn't run, while an older 16bit ran fine.
But if you google around (or if you already have detailed specs) for your Acer you can avoid problems.
As for a distro for your laptop, you didn't post the specs so I don't know if you're talking about a 486 or a 266 or whatever...but you can always give Vector Linux a try...its supposed to be really good on older machines.
tcaptain is saying, avoid the cardbus cards, that's the "marketecture" term for 32-bit, they like to paste it to the side of the box like it means something.
Uhmm... if you have a Cirrus PCMCIA bridge, the kernel doesn't support that anymore.
Slackware is alright for older laptops, honestly, the BSDs do much better. Due to the Cirrus bridge issue, LQ's wireless access point at LinuxWorld was an OpenBSD laptop.
The "card" link in my sig is to the www.linux-wlan.net's huge HCL of cards... anything prism2, lucent, atmel... will work, if its a Lucent card it'll work almost out of the box. Atmels will take 3rd party drivers. Those are about the most common cards.
I have a very old notebook that you can't even stick a 32-bit(CardBus) card all the way into, much less make it work; and yet a 16-bit wireless pcmcia card (belkin f5d6020 version 2) goes in and works fine.
If you're going linux, I also say go with slackware for the older hardware.
I've been meaning to try a distro besides Redhat for some time, but I must admit that I have heard that installing Slackware can be pretty hairy. (I couldn't get Debian to install on a modern box, as a point of comparison ...)
It would certainly be a learning experience, though.
You know, you always see people with their whizbang Vaios running Linux in coffee shops, but I'm thinking, I'd be *much* more proud of getting Slackware to work...
"Hey, look at the piece of crap I have running wireless Linux!!!"
Heh, I am positive my love life will improve immediately.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.