| Linux - Kernel This forum is for all discussion relating to the Linux kernel. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
07-17-2012, 11:41 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Republic of Krakozhia
Distribution: Slackware & Zenwalk core + compile
Posts: 37
Rep:
|
Which pids are reserved for the kernel?
Hi!
I remember that I saw somewhere a parameter to define the minimum PID value for user processes, which means any PID that is below that is a kernel process.
The thing is, I don't remember where... was it in my kernel config?
How to read and define this value?
THANKS!
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 01:11 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian i686 (solaris)
Posts: 2,878
|
I'm afraid I have never heard about reserved PIDs. see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process_identifier. Can you please explain what do you mean?
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 01:29 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Republic of Krakozhia
Distribution: Slackware & Zenwalk core + compile
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan64
|
If you look at
you'll realize all the first (small) PIDS are kernel processes.
You can e.g. guess that if PID < 300, this is a kernel process, so you'd better not try to kill it!
The thing is, this is not always 300 and this number can be configured (and read). I just don't remember where.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 01:35 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2012
Location: Hungary
Distribution: debian i686 (solaris)
Posts: 2,878
|
I see. There is no limit, there is no such number, it always depend on the actual configuration. There is no general rule.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 03:19 PM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,964
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterBark
you'll realize all the first (small) PIDS are kernel processes.
|
As to unique identifiers in kernels up to 2.6.18 (RHEL version w backports), what these processes have in common is all kernel threads share the same user Id (obviously 0) and the same session Id and process group Id. What's more is that, depending on the machines HW, "kthread" spawns a host of children which then share the common "kthread" ancestors identifiers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterBark
The thing is, this is not always 300 and this number can be configured (and read). I just don't remember where.
|
There is a "RESERVED_PIDS" with default value of 300 in kernel/pid.c (2.6.29 - 3.4: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source...pid.c?v=2.6.29) but if you would run a '\ps axfo pid,ppid,pgid,sid,sess,uid,cmd --sort=pid' then you see no artificial limit is posed.
I'll move this thread out of the Linux Security forum to the Kernel forum as this in no way is related to Linux Security.
Next time please give a wee bit more thought to where you post, TIA.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 06:20 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Jul 2012
Location: Republic of Krakozhia
Distribution: Slackware & Zenwalk core + compile
Posts: 37
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by unSpawn
|
Ah ok!
fine
Sorry, I've never seen there was kernel section!
|
|
|
|
07-17-2012, 06:36 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderator
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 24,964
|
No need to be sorry, just have fun.
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
07-18-2012, 01:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SE Tennessee, USA
Distribution: Gentoo, LFS
Posts: 4,578
|
PID #1 (init) is hard-coded. This process-table entry is constructed "by hand" during kernel initialization, and this very special process cannot die. (If it does, the kernel panics.)
Some operating systems have several such "hand built" entries, and the definition and purpose of these special processes vary from system to system.
"Kernel threads" are parts of the operating system kernel that are need to operate in an asynchronous fashion. (For instance, kswapd needs to perform disk I/O and to wait for completion of those I/O operations.) They are nevertheless "fully part of the kernel" and as such they operate by special rules. They will typically have low-numbered PIDs although there are no fixed assignments.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|