The keyboard and mouse doesn't mount.
I got only the screen with log in screen~

Hi,
If you want help, you are going to have to tell us why you are compiling your own kernel.

Evo2.

---------- Post added 2013-06-25 at 11:50 ----------

Hi,

So that you can make use off more than one cpu or core.

Evo2.

Because our company's source code were based on kernel 3.6.11 to Development. And its original platform was POWERPC.
I only want to make use of one cpu intel E250(??)
Thanks

Hi,
sorry I still don't understand why you are doing this, or why the kernel you compiled didn't drive the mouse or keyboard. What is your actual goal? Are you really sure that you need to be running a 3.6.11 kernel?

What is "your company's source code"? Is it a kernel module/driver?
If this is a reference to -j and/or concurrency then I guess you are stuck with compiling with just one cpu.

Evo2.

Our source program is not only a kernel module/driver, It is a totally solution of some buisness field.I mysely didn't see the
original program. I just to tell that I had to run kernel 3.6.11 in my VTC1000 industrial computer.
Oh~ Did you mean that I can't compile with only just one cpu? I had to set .config with each cpu that exists in .config?
Thks!

hmm, i could be wrong, but as i understand it, normally third party kernel drivers, if built properly don't require the entire kernel to be built, they just need a copy of the current kernel headers to compile against, then they get installed into the module directory and modpobed like any other module, but the build process for a third party module SHOULD be separate from the actual kernel source build. case in point the NVIDIA proprietary driver install process compiles the kernel module as part of the install process, but not the entire kernel, same goes with virtualbox.

Hi,
So it's a kernel module...

This? http://datarespons.com/Products-new/...om-VTC-7110-B/
If so, AFAIKS it's just a basic 32 bit atom. Nothing particularly exotic.

No. I meant that by using that option you can compile with more than one cpu. What .config are you starting with? Have you tried doing "make oldconfig" so that you start with something that should "just work"? Eg
Evo2.

I start with copy the exist .config of Ubuntu 12.04 kernel 3.0.29.
So, you means that I shouldn't use the above one. I should doing "make oldconfig"

It will take me at least 5 hours!!
Can I change the content of .config to achieve so???

Hi,
Have you considered compiling the kernel on a more powerful machine?

Yes.

Evo2.

Our solution is base on this VTC 1000, I wonder that if I compile on the other machine, the contents of device driver support
will be different.
like I already changed the kernel to 3.6.11 of My personal PC for long. It works very well.But I just can do it the same way
to my VTC 1000.

I had printed out all the data in .config, But still I can't catch point to change its content.
Could you suggest that which part of it I should marked(erase) for the VTC 1000 in the .config file?

Hi,

that machine just runs a 32 bit atom processor. It is generic x86. You can compile it anywhere. For example if you want to compile it on another system that happens to be a 64 bit machine and are using the make-kpkg method, you could do:
That above line is actually from the README.gz that comes with the kernel-package package.


Evo2.

Hi,You can change all the config options when you run
Don't edit it by hand. Use the one of the standard tools like menuconfig as I've mentioned previously. If you know what that device will actually be used for there should be a huge number of things you don't need to build into the kernel.

Evo2.

OK. let me try to do so, and after that I should have to do one thing, to copy for which files into my VTC 1000.
Is that vmlinuz-3.x , initrd.img-3.x, System.map-3.x abi-3.x config-3.x???