Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've got two systems available to me and can make one of them into a dedicated Linux box for playing around and Mono development.
I was hoping someone could give me some input as to which would be best, and why.
First option: PIII 800EB on a P3V4X (Apollo Pro 133a chipset) with 256M PC133 ECC RAM.
Second option: Athlon T-Bird 800 on K7T Turbo (KT133A chipset) with 256M PC100 RAM.
Whichever machine isn't the linux box is going to be a Windows 2000 Advanced Server box running IIS (I need it for work).
Yeah, use the Athlon. Advanced Server running IIS is a resource-hungry setup and will be better off with the 133 memory bus on the other board. We've run it at work on 700 MHz machines a couple of years ago and it was tough going with the machine loaded up. It needs all the help it can get :-) .
I was hoping that would be the answer. The PIII has been my Win2k web server for a couple of years and not changing it is definately the path of least resistance. I was just worried that Linux liked Pentiums better--I don't know why I thought that. Now I can ditch my Pentium 233 (with MMX!) Redhat machine that's always been too slow to be useful and build a SuSE machine with the Athlon box I'm scavenging from old parts laying around here.
I was hoping that would be the answer. The PIII has been my Win2k web server for a couple of years and not changing it is definately the path of least resistance. I was just worried that Linux liked Pentiums better--I don't know why I thought that. Now I can ditch my Pentium 233 (with MMX!) Redhat machine that's always been too slow to be useful and build a SuSE machine with the Athlon box I'm scavenging from old parts laying around here.
Thanks for the guidance.
If I were you, I'd find some use for that 233 with Slackware. Be it a webserver, fileserver, or whatnot. Is it a quiet machine or loud machine? I wish I hadn't dismantled my 133mhz, that thing was so quiet, it would've made a great dedicated server for one thing or another. Maybe even just for SETI....
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.