Quote:
Originally Posted by jefro
Sure one could make a claim that swap space on a raw drive is faster, I agree. Sure one might even make a claim about more usable space and that would be true as it is in other OS's. I might even agree with some raid arrays having a use.
|
Usable space... well, the only wasted space in a partitioned drive is the partition table, nothing else. And that's 512 bytes for MBR. Not a bid deal really.
About swap: not even having a swap file is any slower these days, because nowadays the kernel bypasses all the fs magic when accessing swap. So, it really doesn't matter if the swap lives in a dedicated partition, a raw disk or a file. The kernel will read the on-disk position directly, it's irrelevant. Well, you might wasted an extra microsecond while initializing the swap, that's about it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orangutanklaus
Thanks for your intervention. I also don't see any context between raw access onto devices and my initial question. For now I can't see any weightly reasons that make the writing of a filesystem directly onto a dvice inadvisable, if the circumstances are given
|
Linux has
no problem accessing these devices. The only problems can come from individual applications. Mostly low level tools, since the rest of the OS just deals with files and doesn't care about devices.
For example: your boot manager, testdisk, partitioning tools and that kind of stuff. However, any bootloader that can boot from a floppy or a cdrom (which are unpartitioned) shouldn't have any problem booting from sda instead of let's say sda1.
No, there's no advantage. There
shouldn't (note the use of conditional) be any problem either.