LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 07-21-2007, 06:44 PM   #1
mmiikkee12
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Distribution: Between distros
Posts: 14

Rep: Reputation: 0
Stupid disk renaming


Why do the new kernels from most distros insist on calling my IDE disks sd*? I have an IDE hard disk, IDE DVD drive, and some builtin memory card readers (which I understand connect through some kind of internal USB port), and all of them are now changing to sd*. (The memory card readers have always been sd*, but my IDE disks should be hd*). I compiled my own kernel on one of my systems just to get rid of this.

I've heard this has something to do with the new libata stuff in the kernel. Anyone know what exactly was wrong with the old IDE drivers? They've always worked fine for me...
 
Old 07-21-2007, 08:42 PM   #2
syg00
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,126

Rep: Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120Reputation: 4120
Have a read of this.
 
Old 07-21-2007, 09:59 PM   #3
mmiikkee12
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Earth
Distribution: Between distros
Posts: 14

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
The issue that gets everybody's attention, however, is that, as with all drives handled through libata, PATA drives show up as if they were SCSI disks, and are named /dev/sd*.
Yes, that's my major problem with it. But I still don't see why the old IDE subsystem needed replacement in the first place...

Oh well. All it should take is a few fancy udev rules or symlinks.

Thanks for the link though.
 
Old 07-21-2007, 10:07 PM   #4
lazlow
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,363

Rep: Reputation: 172Reputation: 172
The reasoning behind it is uniformity. Instead of handling some drives this way and some drives that way, it will move to handling all drives one way. In the end this will make life easier for us all. But for now we are going through "the oops we never thought of that" stage.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid, stupid spoofing teejaytimms Linux - Server 6 10-30-2006 10:25 AM
Stupid, stupid question; I lost Klaptop. :( Surfrider Slackware 2 08-31-2005 09:12 PM
Stupid Dumb Stupid Question... drigz Linux - Software 3 09-23-2004 03:09 PM
Stupid Book Disk Creation Problem theonlylivinggo Linux - Newbie 3 01-27-2004 08:27 PM
stupid stupid newb ? what to use instead of xconfigurator h00ligan Fedora 3 01-25-2004 09:51 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration