Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Why do the new kernels from most distros insist on calling my IDE disks sd*? I have an IDE hard disk, IDE DVD drive, and some builtin memory card readers (which I understand connect through some kind of internal USB port), and all of them are now changing to sd*. (The memory card readers have always been sd*, but my IDE disks should be hd*). I compiled my own kernel on one of my systems just to get rid of this.
I've heard this has something to do with the new libata stuff in the kernel. Anyone know what exactly was wrong with the old IDE drivers? They've always worked fine for me...
The issue that gets everybody's attention, however, is that, as with all drives handled through libata, PATA drives show up as if they were SCSI disks, and are named /dev/sd*.
Yes, that's my major problem with it. But I still don't see why the old IDE subsystem needed replacement in the first place...
Oh well. All it should take is a few fancy udev rules or symlinks.
The reasoning behind it is uniformity. Instead of handling some drives this way and some drives that way, it will move to handling all drives one way. In the end this will make life easier for us all. But for now we are going through "the oops we never thought of that" stage.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.