Should external USB drives be always formated as FAT32 ?
Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Should external USB drives be always formated as FAT32 ?
If a USB drive is used under Linux and Windows, what would be the best file system? FAT32?
Would it harm to have the drive formated as NTFS?
How reliable is Linux when writing to NTFS today and is it worth taking the risk?
I am asking this because I am pretty sure that there are a lot of peoples out there with external drives that are formated in NTFS.
The main reason for this is that a OS like Windows XP cannot format a FAT32 partition bigger then 32GB and without noticing users might format their drives to NTFS.
I often format my USB drives in NTFS, especially when I have to put files on them that are larger as 4 GB, which is impossible with FAT32. I use NTFS-3G for handling those devices and never had any problems with it. Maybe you shouldn't do it if you want to transport important files for your really important presentation, but as I said, never had any problems here.
ntfs-3g seems to work fine, even for repairing damaged ntfs volumes. There is no reason anymore to use FAT for anything, except DOS-based repair disks.
Distribution: Slackware (mainly) and then a lot of others...
Posts: 855
Rep:
MS does not recommend FAT for more than 2MB I think. I dual booted for about a year with xp and debian had no issues with ntfs at all (all music files were on ntfs).
Now all the drives I have are formatted with ntfs because they have to work with some stupid winduhs machines .
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.04 , Linux Mint Debian Edition , Microsoft Windows 7
Posts: 390
Rep:
i don't know about you but i use ntfs for a big partition on my hard drive on which i put all my files all my movies . theres no windows system on it and it is corrupted . but ntfs-3g seems to handle it fine.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.