Okay. so I've got a FileServer that I've put a lot of work into; I decided to have one HDD be the OS, and my brand new 1TB drive be my actual file serving volume.
I got it set up, however ran into a few problems regarding my domain name, BSD, and then a bug, which led me to change my OS to CentOS 6.3. the problem is, that my fileserver volume is UFS which CentOS doesn't recognize by default. I Did some online searching, and found and installed the proper kernel module from
here. however now when I attempt to mount it, I get this:
Code:
[root@FileServer files]# mount -t ufs /dev/sda /mnt/FilServe/
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
then I decided to follow my system's suggestion (I figured it knew what it was talking about). I got this:
Code:
[root@FileServer files]# dmesg | tail
ufs was compiled with read-only support, can't be mounted as read-write
however an ls -al of the directory returns:
Code:
[root@FileServer files]# ls -al /dev/sda*
brw-rw----. 1 root disk 8, 0 Aug 2 01:15 /dev/sda
brw-rw----. 1 root disk 8, 1 Aug 2 01:15 /dev/sda1
brw-rw----. 1 root disk 8, 2 Aug 2 01:15 /dev/sda2
so I'm a little worried here. I'm pretty sure, that the hard drive itself is intact, as it was working just fine before, however, I'm confused as to why this is being so uncooperative. I'm not sure why it's saying it's read only, when the permissions say it's not, and even if it is read only, I don't really know how to fix it. I REALLY don't want to have to reformat that volume, as I don't have anything with which to backup the data; so I'm hoping that I missed something, or typed something in wrong. Any help is appreciated